Dear All, The public comment forum has now closed. The staff support team has gathered the comments related to the SOI in the following discussion table: https://docs.google.com/document/d/13jhExwduE7qrRovZFDw5FwAjtUlSffwz/edit. Please also review the comments in full (see https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/updates-to-the-gnso-state...). In order to prepare for the TF’s review of the input received, please provide your input in the google doc table at the bottom indicating whether you support the suggestions made, and if so, how these should be addressed in the TF’s report. We propose to schedule a meeting for the task force on Wednesday 7 December at 14.00 UTC so please provide your input by Tuesday 6 December at the latest. Best regards, Julie & Marika From: GNSO-SOI-TF <gnso-soi-tf-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of "James M. Bladel via GNSO-SOI-TF" <gnso-soi-tf@icann.org> Reply to: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com> Date: Friday, 11 November 2022 at 18:51 To: "gnso-soi-tf@icann.org" <gnso-soi-tf@icann.org> Subject: [GNSO-SOI-TF] SOI-TF CircleID post from Jon Nevett (PIR CEO) Colleagues - During last week’s Contracted Party House (CPH) Summit, I had a chance to catch up with a few folks who have been following our work. The team at Public Interest Registry (PIR, operator of .ORG) were very interested in our recommendations, and had some feedback on additional transparency measures we might consider. I believe they also plan to submit this as a Public Comment. Article here: https://circleid.com/posts/20221110-icann-policymaking-should-be-even-more-t... [circleid.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/circleid.com/posts/20221110-icann-policym...> Thank you, J.