Hi Susan, Comment b) was provided by the NCSG. Note that as the comment was submitted late it is attached to the public comment report (see https://itp.cdn.icann.org/en/files/generic-names-supporting-organization-cou...). Comment c) was provided by Elizabeth Reed in response to the sample SOI survey that was made available as part of the public comment forum. Best regards, Marika From: Susan Payne <susan.payne@comlaude.com> Date: Tuesday, 6 December 2022 at 12:52 To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com>, "gnso-soi-tf@icann.org" <gnso-soi-tf@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] RE: [GNSO-SOI-TF] Public comment review Hi Marika, could you clarify which public comment input b) and c) have come from please – or does this input come from elsewhere? Susan Payne Head of Legal Policy Com Laude T +44 (0) 20 7421 8250 Ext 255 [cid:image001.png@01D90973.B0A1E7F0][comlaude.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/comlaude.com/__;!!PtGJab4!72hUl0tDU6vDBUN...> From: GNSO-SOI-TF <gnso-soi-tf-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: 05 December 2022 20:32 To: James M. Bladel <jbladel@godaddy.com>; gnso-soi-tf@icann.org Subject: Re: [GNSO-SOI-TF] Public comment review Reminder – please provide your input by Tuesday 6 December at the latest: https://docs.google.com/document/d/13jhExwduE7qrRovZFDw5FwAjtUlSffwz/edit [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/13jhExwduE7qrR...> Best regards, Julie and Marika From: GNSO-SOI-TF <gnso-soi-tf-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-soi-tf-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Date: Tuesday, 22 November 2022 at 09:01 To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>>, "gnso-soi-tf@icann.org<mailto:gnso-soi-tf@icann.org>" <gnso-soi-tf@icann.org<mailto:gnso-soi-tf@icann.org>> Subject: [GNSO-SOI-TF] Public comment review Dear All, The public comment forum has now closed. The staff support team has gathered the comments related to the SOI in the following discussion table: https://docs.google.com/document/d/13jhExwduE7qrRovZFDw5FwAjtUlSffwz/edit [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/13jhExwduE7qrR...>. Please also review the comments in full (see https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/updates-to-the-gnso-state...). In order to prepare for the TF’s review of the input received, please provide your input in the google doc table at the bottom indicating whether you support the suggestions made, and if so, how these should be addressed in the TF’s report. We propose to schedule a meeting for the task force on Wednesday 7 December at 14.00 UTC so please provide your input by Tuesday 6 December at the latest. Best regards, Julie & Marika From: GNSO-SOI-TF <gnso-soi-tf-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-soi-tf-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of "James M. Bladel via GNSO-SOI-TF" <gnso-soi-tf@icann.org<mailto:gnso-soi-tf@icann.org>> Reply to: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>> Date: Friday, 11 November 2022 at 18:51 To: "gnso-soi-tf@icann.org<mailto:gnso-soi-tf@icann.org>" <gnso-soi-tf@icann.org<mailto:gnso-soi-tf@icann.org>> Subject: [GNSO-SOI-TF] SOI-TF CircleID post from Jon Nevett (PIR CEO) Colleagues - During last week’s Contracted Party House (CPH) Summit, I had a chance to catch up with a few folks who have been following our work. The team at Public Interest Registry (PIR, operator of .ORG) were very interested in our recommendations, and had some feedback on additional transparency measures we might consider. I believe they also plan to submit this as a Public Comment. Article here: https://circleid.com/posts/20221110-icann-policymaking-should-be-even-more-t... [circleid.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/circleid.com/posts/20221110-icann-policym...> Thank you, J. ________________________________ The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient. They may not be disclosed, used by or copied in any way by anyone other than the intended recipient. If you have received this message in error, please return it to the sender (deleting the body of the email and attachments in your reply) and immediately and permanently delete it. Please note that Com Laude Group Limited (the “Com Laude Group”) does not accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise check this email and any attachments. The Com Laude Group does not accept liability for statements which are clearly the sender's own and not made on behalf of the group or one of its member entities. The Com Laude Group is a limited company registered in England and Wales with company number 10689074 and registered office at 28-30 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England. The Com Laude Group includes Nom-IQ Limited t/a Com Laude, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 5047655 and registered office at 28-30 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England; Valideus Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 6181291 and registered office at 28-30 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England; Demys Limited, a company registered in Scotland with company number SC197176 and registered office at 15 William Street, South West Lane, Edinburgh, EH3 7LL Scotland; Consonum, Inc. dba Com Laude USA and Valideus USA, a corporation incorporated in the State of Washington and principal office address at Suite 332, Securities Building, 1904 Third Ave, Seattle, WA 98101; Com Laude (Japan) Corporation, a company registered in Japan with company number 0100-01-190853 and registered office at 1-3-21 Shinkawa, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0033, Japan; Com Laude Domain ESP S.L.U., a company registered in Spain and registered office address at Calle Barcas 2, 2, Valencia, 46002, Spain. For further information see www.comlaude.com [comlaude.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/comlaude.com__;!!PtGJab4!72hUl0tDU6vDBUN8...>