Hopefully we reach 
a consensus on the latest version of the "4seats" text today.

P.s: I managed to relay info to RySG and I had no negative response, but the comments, 
that, most probably, the letter will be rejected due to bylaws (and 3 seats in the texts there).

Sincerely Yours,

Maxim Alzoba
Special projects manager,
International Relations Department,
FAITID

m. +7 916 6761580
skype oldfrogger

Current UTC offset: +3.00 (Moscow)

On Apr 19, 2017, at 19:14, Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg@safebrands.com> wrote:

Hello


i support the latest version.

Frederic



Le 19/04/2017 à 16:18, Marika Konings a écrit :
Thanks, Renate. Per your suggestion, please see updated version attached. Are there any objections to this change? 

Note that there are still quite a few people that have not weighed in on the proposed approach forward. So far, I’ve seen support from Poncelet, Julf and Renate. We have our call coming up in less than 3 hours so any feedback you may have in advance would be welcome.

Best regards,

Marika

On 4/18/17, 20:47, "Renata Aquino Ribeiro" <raquino@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi
    
    Just as yesterday, I support this approach.
    
    I just have one observation about the text of the motion - It lists
    candidates first in (surname) alphabetical order and then in ranking
    order.
    It would be clearer if the top 4 were also on ranking order.
    
    Thanks
    
    Renata
    
    
    On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Marika Konings
    <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
    > Thanks, Julf. I know that several of you expressed support for the approach on the way forward yesterday, but I just want to make sure that the proposed changes to the motion meet everyone’s expectations with regards to what was discussed. In addition, we especially need to hear from those of you that were not able to make the meeting.
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    > Marika
    >
    > On 4/18/17, 08:53, "gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Johan Helsingius" <gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org on behalf of julf@julf.com> wrote:
    >
    >     Dear Marika,
    >
    >     > So far
    >     > I’ve only seen Poncelet express his support for the proposed way
    >     > forward.
    >
    >     I assumed that it was clear from our call that I support this approach,
    >     but let me hereby state it explicitly.
    >
    >         Julf
    >
    >     _______________________________________________
    >     Gnso-ssc mailing list
    >     Gnso-ssc@icann.org
    >     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Gnso-ssc mailing list
    > Gnso-ssc@icann.org
    > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
    



_______________________________________________
Gnso-ssc mailing list
Gnso-ssc@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc

--
photo
 
Frédéric Guillemaut
Directeur Associé, SafeBrands

Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai • 37 rue Guibal • 13003 Marseille • France

N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate.
_______________________________________________
Gnso-ssc mailing list
Gnso-ssc@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc