Hi Lori,

It is fine to share the questions either using the attached working document (which is also posted on the publicly accessible wiki) or by sharing the “preview” version of the poll: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_Preview_-3Fsm-3D0kmHUwrR8LPXqqz64zxwbFIsitOE7P4MFUBIQjaXUvv9SoIzow75Is7gYJASBrUU&d=DwIGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=cTipEqgvZBLiPH-bZPcgDYGXMDwdcXRvlbL-d0rCLRk&s=fhEYoNdRPWEybKzP91kj0tThs1SfbQJGiu1j4ctoK3w&e= .

We just ask that you do not share the actual poll link once it is circulated, as we only want SSC members to complete it.

Kind regards,

Emily

From: Lori Schulman <lschulman@inta.org>
Date: Thursday 1 June 2017 at 14:27
To: Johan Helsingius <julf@julf.com>, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org>, "gnso-ssc@icann.org" <gnso-ssc@icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] RE: [Gnso-ssc] Poll "preview" - EC Admin representative

I have read the preview and agree with Julf’s observation and Emily’s proposed solution.  I look forward to discussing it with my constituency.  May I circulate the questions to my constituency list to get their ideas?  They may have something that we haven’t thought of.

Lori

Lori S. Schulman

Senior Director, Internet Policy

International Trademark Association (INTA)

+1-202-704-0408, Skype: lsschulman

From: gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Johan Helsingius
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 11:52 AM
To: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org>; gnso-ssc@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-ssc] Poll "preview" - EC Admin representative

Dear Emily,

Thanks for the clarification - with that, I am OK with the
poll being sent out.

Julf

On 01-06-17 11:00, Emily Barabas wrote:
> Dear Julf,
>
> Thanks for your question. I think in this case, for question 1, it may be easiest to select “other” and simply describe your preference as you do below. We will not be analyzing the results quantitatively. The goal is primarily to understand what different SSC members are thinking at this point. To that end, as long as your response captures your point of view, it will provide useful input for the discussion.
>
> Kind regards,
> Emily
>
> On 01/06/17 10:39, "gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Johan Helsingius" <gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org on behalf of julf@julf.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Emily,
>
> I am not sure how to handle the interaction of questions 1
> and 2.
>
> In question 1 we address the GNSO chair, and the questions
> assume he/she is either first choice or the alternative
> choice - but in question 2 there is the possibility of the
> rep being selected from current council leadership - so the
> chair is one possibility, but not the only one.
>
> In this case, should one answer "yes" to both choices in
> question 1?
>
> Would it be clearer to add a possibility of "the chair is
> not special" on question 1?
>
> Julf
>
> On 01-06-17 10:24, Emily Barabas wrote:
> > Dear SSC members,
> >
> >
> >
> > As discussed yesterday, we will be opening a poll on some of the key
> > questions the SSC is considering related to the EC Admin representative.
> > Over the last two meetings, we have received input from Sam Eisner &
> > Trang Nguyen (ICANN org) and James Bladel (GNSO Council Chair and
> > interim rep) to support development of the selection process.
> >
> >
> >
> > The purpose of this poll is to get a sense of the direction of travel
> > from the group and see if agreement is beginning to form on key
> > questions related to this selection process.
> >
> >
> >
> > The poll is currently in “preview” mode so that you can review the
> > questions:
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_Preview_-3Fsm-3D0kmHUwrR8LPXqqz64zxwbFIsitOE7P4MFUBIQjaXUvv9SoIzow75Is7gYJASBrUU&d=DwIGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=cTipEqgvZBLiPH-bZPcgDYGXMDwdcXRvlbL-d0rCLRk&s=fhEYoNdRPWEybKzP91kj0tThs1SfbQJGiu1j4ctoK3w&e= .
> > If you enter a response at this point, it will not be recorded. *If you
> > have any feedback on the questions or survey structure, please send
> > comments by 8:00 UTC tomorrow. *Staff will then incorporate any feedback
> > and open the poll. **
> >
> >
> >
> > Note that an updated working document with questions and discussion
> > points is attached for reference.
> >
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Emily
> >
> >
> >
> > *Emily Barabas *| Policy Specialist
> >
> > *ICANN*| Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
> >
> > Email: emily.barabas@icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gnso-ssc mailing list
> > Gnso-ssc@icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ssc mailing list
> Gnso-ssc@icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
>

_______________________________________________
Gnso-ssc mailing list
Gnso-ssc@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc