I have reviewed the poll and it seems very easy to insert input I am fine with it.Thanks for setting it up.On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> wrote:Dear SSC members,
It appears that Survey Monkey is now requiring users to login to use the poll in “preview” mode. I apologize for that. I don’t think this was previously the case with this mode.
To ensure everyone can test the poll, I’ve gone ahead and opened it. Please use this link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r
/DFHMTT5 . I will clear the results before we start officially collecting votes, so feel free to submit “test” answers.
Let’s extend the deadline for testing the poll. How about Tuesday 30 January at 11:00 UTC? If anyone needs more time, please just let me know.
Kind regards,
Emily
From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org>
Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 21:51
To: "gnso-ssc@icann.org" <gnso-ssc@icann.org>
Subject: Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT
Dear SSC members,
Following an action item from the call today, staff has produced a draft poll to evaluate remaining SSR2-RT candidates based on attributes included in the attached skills matrix. Please find a preview of the draft poll here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/c
reate/preview/?sm=50pEczALMZ80 .V7EW8NRJ5gXbjv4aYn8s_ 2BehtuuSaiKM_3D&tab_clicked=1
Please note that the poll is not yet open. The preview allows you to test the format and provide feedback. If you would like to suggest changes to the poll content or format, please send your input by 20:00 UTC on Sunday 28 January. Staff will open the poll on Monday.
Kind regards,
Emily
From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org>
Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 09:08
To: "gnso-ssc@icann.org" <gnso-ssc@icann.org>
Subject: Notes and Action Items - SSC Meeting - 25 January 2018
Dear SSC members,
Please see below the action items and discussion notes from our meeting today. These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.or
g/x/Uge8B .
For reference, the proposed draft revisions to the SSC Charter are attached. Members are encouraged to send comments about this document to the list. In particular, please provide input on the Transparency section on page 4.
Kind regards,
Emily
ACTION ITEMS
Action Item 1: Staff will circulate draft pol
l for feedback comparing skills of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and rows in the attached skills matrix. Action Item 2: SSC members will review the attached redline charter and provide feedback, with particular focus on the Transparency section on page 4.
Action Item 3: Staff will send out a Doodle poll for the next meeting, planned for the second week of February.
NOTES:
1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI U
pdates - no SOI updates
2. Comparison of remaining SSR
2-RT candidates and matrix of skills produced by existing SSR2-RT members - GNSO Council has tasked SSC
with comparing the two remaini ng candidates for the SSR-RT with the skills matrix produce d by the existing SSR-RT candidates. - Existing team appears to be fairly bala
nced. There does not appear to be any category that is an obvious gap. - The candidates have distinct
skill sets. - One possible path forward - one or two members t
ake the lead in filling in can didate skills in the table. The rest of the group reviews and refines this analysis. - Alternate approach - conduct
a poll among all members. - The SSC could also go back to the original poll completed earlier this year and see how the candidates com
pare, noting that this poll is less granular. - Reminder that the Council tasked the SSC with focusing on the skills ma
trix and whether candidates fi ll any gaps. This is not yet a selection assignment. - Members agree to conduct a new poll (see action item).
3. Review of draft proposed re
visions to the SSC Charter - Staff has created a first dr
aft of the proposed revised ch arter based on the feedback re ceived from SSC members and di scussion on the previous call. From the chat:
Maxim Alzoba: I think we need
feedback from other members to o Maxim Alzoba: I have a comment
about page5 - the described situation is related to the case where there is no consensus and SSC needs to report the issue to the GNSO Councel with prepared reasoning and options Maxim Alzoba: it was about min
ority views
- Support expressed for keeping text: "as well as any minority views
, should these exist” (at the bottom of page 5). - Regarding the section on Transparency, the optics might
be a challenge if we publish information about deliberation s before the Council has made a decision. - One suggestion -- make delib
erations private, including call recordings, and email list before a decision is made, publish this information later. - Alternately, the group conti
nue with the status quo and ensure timely communication to candidates when the group notifies the GNSO Council of its recommendation. From the chat:
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I'm muc
h more in favor of making this list only private Maxim Alzoba: @Renata, I am no
t sure we can do it Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I think
halfway solutions are awkward . Either we have full transpar ency or not. Renata Aquino Ribeiro: and pro
ne to errors, non-records Maxim Alzoba: if we do not fin
d the way to properly design delayed output model, we might continue the usual way of SSC Renata Aquino Ribeiro: i think
the delay is just for the announcement Maxim Alzoba: after all it wor
ks more or less Ok Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (which
is only real anyway once GNSO right?) Emily Barabas: Perhaps the gro
up can start with timely notif ications and then if it encoun ters issues, look into further measures? Maxim Alzoba: when we release
the same info to all participa nts, it is both transparent and clear... we might need a proper disclaimer section of such messages
- Suggestion – revis-t timelin
e document to ensure the group is notifying candidates in a timely manner. - Suggestion -- add additional
clarification in the email from the SSC to candidates with disclaimer text.
4. AOB
- none
Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist
ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
Email: emily.barabas@icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976
_______________________________________________
Gnso-ssc mailing list
Gnso-ssc@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
_______________________________________________
Gnso-ssc mailing list
Gnso-ssc@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc