Dear All

I am coming back to you regarding the selection that was issued by the team on Monday.

As i explained to you, i think the process should have taken one more validation step, as it was scheduled.

In fact, i still believe that this list, without any Registry or Registrar, on this matter, is not a wise solution, or at least does not send a right message of commitment to the community :

To solve that issue, as i suggested, we could switch seats 3 and 4 (or 5) to  include either Marc or Volker. This way, the voice of the team would be stronger / have more credibility when they will have to push their ideas to other components of Icann.

This feeling is shared by both constituencies, and i really think it would be easier,  to make this change within the team, to reach a consensus based decision, before having to present that list to the gnso.

That would not be the first time a list or guide is changed after publication, and to me it is for the better,

Please take that in consideration,


Best regards




--
photo
 
Frédéric Guillemaut
Directeur Associé, SafeBrands

Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai • 37 rue Guibal • 13003 Marseille • France

N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate.