Hi Emily,

 

Thanks for sending this through. I wonder whether we want to break out the criteria the SG/C Leaders have identified as particularly important for GNSO appointees? So the existing question evaluating the overall suitability of the candidate(s) for the role remains, but the specific criteria that have been identified as critical to the GNSO are also assessed separately.

 

#3 (“understanding of the IRP and its role as an ICANN accountability mechanism”); and

#4 (“relevant organizational and process experience, i.e. ability to understand and evaluate the standing panelist criteria and responses, which includes legal and arbitration experience”)

 

I’m not saying we have to do this, but just floating the idea.

 

Thanks,

Sophie

 

 

 

Dear all,

 

Please find below a draft poll to support your individual evaluations of the candidate to serve as the GNSO Representative to the Community Representatives Group that will nominate the Independent Review Process (IRP) Standing Panel.

 

The draft poll is available here in “preview” mode: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=pzivfiRKbvQU1QYS4Q2UtbUETYBdsHJRYyhEhTzSX4R4hkPIlmSov7PhGEgbGVFI. If you have any feedback about the poll format, please share it on the mailing list no later than tomorrow, Friday 8 December at 23:59 UTC. The poll will be opened on Monday.

 

Kind regards,
Emily