Personally I would prefer that the GNSO representative to the EC Admin was not from the leadership team, I accepted it since it seemed to be the
position of the majority of the SSC.
I think that it is better if the representative has what I think in English is call it an “arm length” separation from the Council. This way we
can ensure that the representative has to consult the GNSO in every occasion and we diminish the possibility that the representative gives what he thinks is the position of the GNSO Council without consulting previously. This does not mean that I distrust
the actual Council leadership team, it is just that it is a good way to prevent any misunderstanding.
Best regards,
Osvaldo
De: gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org]
En nombre de Susan Kawaguchi
Enviado el: martes, 13 de junio de 2017 01:42 p.m.
Para: Marika Konings
CC: gnso-ssc@icann.org
Asunto: Re: [Gnso-ssc] For your review - draft process to designate GNSO Rep to EC Admin
Thank you Marika for clarifying the process required for the EC admin. I agree we can still recommend that the EC Admin role be filled by Council leadership team.
Anyone else have thoughts on this additional information?
Susan
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
Dear All,
Per the SSC discussion, I reached out to our legal colleagues to obtain some further information in relation to whether it would be possible
to have the collective of the GNSO Leadership team (GNSO Chair and Council Vice-Chairs) designated as the GNSO representative to the Empowered Community Administration. They pointed out that the Bylaw language states that “Each Decisional Participant shall
deliver annually a written certification from its chair or co-chairs to the Secretary designating
the individual who shall represent the Decisional Participant on the EC Administration”. As such, under the scenario that the SSC is currently considering, it would be a requirement for the GNSO Leadership team to make a determination who would serve
in the role of representative to EC Administration so that this person subsequently can be designated by the GNSO Council. This, however, does not preclude those on the leadership team that have not been designated to step in if/when needed but it would be
recommendable to include this possibility as part of the designation so there is clarity around this possibility of an alternate. Based on this information, the process, based on the scenario of having the leadership team make a determination of who from the
leadership team would serve in the role as representative to the EC Admin could look as follows:
As noted, this is a possible way in which the scenario of having a member of the GNSO leadership team (GNSO Chair and Council Vice-Chairs)
serve as the designated representative to the EC Admin, but as always, please feel free to share any comments, edits or alternative scenarios you may have. Following your feedback, the proposed process could be written up in the form of a motion which can
then be shared with the GNSO Council for its consideration ahead of ICANN59.
Best regards,
Marika
Marika Konings
Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email:
marika.konings@icann.org
Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and
visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages.
_______________________________________________
Gnso-ssc mailing list
Gnso-ssc@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc