Dear All,
That is my suggestion,
indeed.
And i think :
- it acts for improving diversity as it includes one member from the contracted parties
- it acts for the
future as it include people who will have to make the
implementation and have the background of 25 + years of whois
management (registries / registrars) .
We have sometimes seen
guidelines that became nightmares to implement for a day to day
use. So my suggestion, i think, does not weaken the technical
expertise, and i think the 'ground experience' of whois was left
aside (as it is difficult to measure) in the notes.
So, i think we should look
at it in that way,
Best regards
Frederic
Dear Frédéric (and all), So as far as I understand, you are suggesting making the list be: 1-3: Susan Kawaguchi, Erika Mann and Volker Greimann 4-7: Stephanie Perrin, Marc Anderson, Stefania Milan and Timothy Chen That would be one person from the BC, one NCA and one RrSG appointee. I have to argue that that doesn't really improve the diversity, as it would create a situation where no non-commercial people are represented. As such I don't have a strong feeling this way or that, but as the original top 3 all come with a much higher score than the people ranked 4-7, I fear we would be selecting less qualified people in the name of a non-existent improvement in diversity. Julf On 12-04-17 17:22, Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands wrote:Dear All I am coming back to you regarding the selection that was issued by the team on Monday. As i explained to you, i think the process should have taken one more validation step, as it was scheduled. In fact, i still believe that this list, without any Registry or Registrar, on this matter, is not a wise solution, or at least does not send a right message of commitment to the community : To solve that issue, as i suggested, we could switch seats 3 and 4 (or 5) to include either Marc or Volker. This way, the voice of the team would be stronger / have more credibility when they will have to push their ideas to other components of Icann. This feeling is shared by both constituencies, and i really think it would be easier, to make this change within the team, to reach a consensus based decision, before having to present that list to the gnso. That would not be the first time a list or guide is changed after publication, and to me it is for the better, Please take that in consideration, Best regards -- photo <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericguillemaut/> <http://twitter.com/safebrands> Frédéric Guillemaut Directeur Associé, SafeBrands Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 <tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007> France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 <tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022> Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 <tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027> fg@safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> Skype: mailclub1 <#> www.safebrands.com <http://www.safebrands.com> Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai • 37 rue Guibal • 13003 Marseille • France <https://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericguillemaut/> N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc_______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
|
|
|
Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai • 37 rue
Guibal • 13003 Marseille • France