I whole-heartedly support this approach Raymond. In order for us to assess candidates we need complete and thorough responses that enable us to objectively compare qualifications. Case in point is the poll from yesterday’s meeting where there was consensus support for the candidate that was selected and at the same time one SSC member that said none of the candidates were qualified. How can there be such a drastic variation in the assessment?

Best,
Craig

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 8, 2021, at 5:26 AM, Raymond Mamattah <mamattah.raymond@gmail.com> wrote:


Hello Emily and the SSC team,

Happy new year once again.  Having gone through the Terms of Reference for the role, and the specific request from the GNSO to us on this duty, I have few concerns and suggestions.

First, since this is the first time such a duty is coming to us to execute, I suggest we recommend to the GNSO council and to further be passed on to ICANN org that the Expression of Interest should rather come in a template form to be completed.  A specific example is the form used to recruit the GNSO liaison to the CSC.  By getting this template to be used by all applicants with specific questions, it will make it easier for comparing one applicant to the other.  For example, the form should have specific questions for the applicants to answer to indicate how they meet the set criteria.  We can all remember that the template we used recently for the ICANN Fellowship Mentor role helped us so much to compare and choose among the 4 applications we got. I strongly recommend we pass on this suggestion going forward.

Secondly, I support the call for the draft poll to be broken down so we can evaluate if the candidate has met the specific criteria set out for this role as indicated by Sophie.

Regards,

Raymond Mamattah
linkedin  facebook  skype  twitter
Accra, Ghana 


On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:37 PM Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> wrote:

Dear all,

 

Please find below a draft poll to support your individual evaluations of the candidate to serve as the GNSO Representative to the Community Representatives Group that will nominate the Independent Review Process (IRP) Standing Panel.

 

The draft poll is available here in “preview” mode: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=pzivfiRKbvQU1QYS4Q2UtbUETYBdsHJRYyhEhTzSX4R4hkPIlmSov7PhGEgbGVFI. If you have any feedback about the poll format, please share it on the mailing list no later than tomorrow, Friday 8 December at 23:59 UTC. The poll will be opened on Monday.

 

Kind regards,
Emily

 

 

Emily Barabas

Policy Manager, GNSO Policy Development Support

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

www.icann.org

 

 

_______________________________________________
Gnso-ssc mailing list
Gnso-ssc@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________
Gnso-ssc mailing list
Gnso-ssc@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.