Dear Colleagues: I was listening to the recording of the call. Starting round about the 25-minute marker, the discussion came on about incentivising volunteers. Mention was made of travel support as an incentive. I wish to go on record to oppose in the strongest possible terms this notion that travel support be recognized as an incentive. It is wrong-headed and trivializes the sacrifices of volunteers. My position is not new and this declaration is merely a reprise from my earliest days caucusing with the At-Large constituency. All of it is on the record. I am also on record advocating that at the minimum, volunteer input of time be valorized and included in all estimation of costs pertaining names and numbers policy development. I have always found it irksome that everyday corporate reporting finds a place for 'goodwill' but ICANN seems unable to corral and label volunteer time input. First of all, the bald fact is while all volunteers are equal, some are more equal than others. For some, names and numbers policy development is a day job and compensated in the ordinary. For others of us, we volunteer as an act of social responsibility, favouring the public good without compensation or any expectation of recompense whatsoever. Travelling to an ICANN meeting is baked into the operational mode for names and numbers policy development. Travel support is a tool for volunteers that enables participation in advancing the mission to which we have severally committed. And this false narrative about it has enabled volunteers to comfortably discount their obligations to policy development for tourist junkets. Maybe it's because I sell knowledge for fee. I bill by the hour or the [8-hour] day. I know the opportunity cost, what I forgo in fee and possible income for my participation. I have plied more than two (2) million actual air miles for my working life. For me, travelling for more than 4 hours in a coach seat on an aeroplane is not a needful condition of service. Neither is it a gift. For more than 8 years and when I was employed as a senior administrator, I routinely gave up my vacation time to attend ICANN meetings. And in attending those meetings, I routinely spend my own money to make myself more comfortable; I am 6ft 3" tall. I still do and will continue to invest my own resources as a volunteer. I will resist and voice opposition to any such effort to label travel support as an incentive. Kind regards, Carlton Samuels ============================== *Carlton A Samuels* *Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 9:19 AM Nathalie Peregrine < nathalie.peregrine@icann.org> wrote:

Dear all,

All recordings for the GNSO Standing Selection Committee held on *Thursday, **14** January 2021 at 13:00 UTC *can be found on the agenda wiki page <https://community.icann.org/display/GSSC/2021-01-14+GNSO+Standing+Selection+Committee>(attendance included) and the GNSO Master calendar <https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar/2021>.

These include:

- Attendance (please let me know if your name has been left off the attendance list) - Audio recording - Zoom chat archive - Zoom recording (including audio, visual, rough transcript) - Transcript

Thank you!

Kind Regards,

Nathalie

_______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.