If there are no substantial comments, was it decided to cancel the meeting this coming Thursday. I don’t think the comments I sent are substantial although an edit might be needed. Chuck From: gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 5:44 PM To: gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl] For final review - revised working principles document And that should be Wednesday 26 February, not March..... On 20 feb. 2014, at 23:27, "Marika Konings" <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> wrote: Dear All, Following our call today, please find attached the revised version of the working principles document, both in redline (capturing the changes of today's meeting) as well as a clean version (with a separate annex covering 'notes to the WG'). As those sub-team members that were on the call are of the view that this is now ready for submission to the full WG, you are encouraged to let the mailing list know if you disagree with this assessment and/or share any additional edits / comments you may have. If no substantive comments are received by Wednesday 26 March, the proposed working principles will be submitted to the full WG for review and discussion at its next meeting on 5 March. Thanks for all your hard work! Best regards, Marika <Annex - Notes to pass back to the WG.doc> <PI Working Principles Updated 20 February 2014.doc> <PI Working Principles Clean Updated 20 February 2014.doc> <smime.p7s> _______________________________________________ Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl mailing list Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl