Dear Working Group members,

Please find below the proposed agenda for the next meeting scheduled to take place on Tuesday, 6 June at 16:00 UTC.

As a reminder, here are the homework items from last week’s meeting:

📣 ACTION ITEMS 📣

Charter Question g3: WG members to suggest additional use cases for registrant transfer dispute mechanism.
Charter Questions g4 and g5:WG members to review the redlined Transfer Dispute Resolution Policy with Rec. 27 updates at:https://docs.google.com/document/d/12ncsCc_sYiBs2cRZVOPCrBes92aV0p-6S-7hNBkmM9w/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com] and note anything that might be missing or require clarification. Specifically, are there any red flags for the data elements or documentary evidence in the TDRP? NOTE: The document is set for editing – please use suggestion mode so that changes are highlighted.

Kind regards,

Emily, Julie, Berry, and Caitlin

Transfer Policy Review - Meeting #94

Proposed Agenda

6 June 2023

1. Welcome and Chair updates

2. Recap Outcomes - Last Week’s Call

3. Additional Use Cases Charter Question g3 (draft scenarios)

• Use Cases from IRTP D Final Report, please see pp. 41-42

Two registrant claimants dispute to be the Registered Name Holder immediately prior to or directly following an inter-registrar transfer (entirely b/w registrants; no compliance role)
Two registrant claimants dispute who is the Registered Name Holder of a domain name without an inter-registrant transfer having taken place. There are a number of reasons for such a situation to occur, including – but not limited to – a contractor registering a domain for a client, two business partners splitting, admin contact leave a company but remains listed in the Whois database. (entirely b/w registrants; no compliance role)
Any other use cases from the WG that need to be considered?

4. Charter Question g4

• WG discussion re: homework

5. Charter Question g5

• WG discussion re: homework

6. Planning for ICANN77

7. AOB