Hi all, unfortunately I have been unable to make the last few calls due to litigation matters.  I should make it next week and certainly to the F2F in Den Haag.

Meanwhile, Roger very helpfully summarized for me the discussion on the two issues IPC has flagged.  We understand there is no movement on Rec 12 and can live with that, with thanks for further explanation from Roger.

As to Rec 19, we understand the WG seems coalesced around alternative language that the IPC will support, again with many thanks for considering our concern:

  • Evidence of fraud or violation of registrar’s domain use or anti-abuse policies (emphasis added) (note: this textual addition was suggested by an ICANN org colleague, and seemed to receive the support of the WG)


Thank you all,
Mike

Logo

Mike Rodenbaugh

address:

548 Market Street, Box 55819

San Francisco, CA 94104

email:

mike@rodenbaugh.com

phone:

+1 (415) 738-8087



On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 1:07 PM Mike Rodenbaugh <mike@rodenbaugh.com> wrote:
Apologies I cannot make the call tomorrow as I have to be in court with a client.  

We in the IPC also wanted to Flag Reco #12 for further discussion:

  • Rec. 12 (line 822 of report) – five calendar days, or 120 hours as stated in the report, is too long to wait for a TAC.  While most registrars give this to you instantly or within minutes, we wouldn’t want to wait five days if the matter was urgent and a registrar had that kind of time latitude.  We’d strongly prefer a 1-2 calendar day maximum.

Re Rec #19, we continue to believe that since the stated intention is to have guardrails, that we should recommend that definitional language and not leave it up to later implementation and/or unfettered registrar discretion.

I can make the call next week to further discuss., or here on the list.

Thanks,
Mike

Logo

Mike Rodenbaugh

address:

548 Market Street, Box 55819

San Francisco, CA 94104

email:

mike@rodenbaugh.com

phone:

+1 (415) 738-8087



On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 2:10 PM Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen@icann.org> wrote:

Dear Working Group members,

 

Please find below the proposed agenda for the next meeting scheduled to take place on Tuesday, 17 May 2022 at 16:00 UTC. 

 

Kind regards,

 

Emily, Julie, Berry, and Caitlin

 

Transfer Policy Review Phase 1 - Meeting #47

Proposed Agenda

17 May 2022

 

  1. Roll Call & SOI updates
  2. Welcome and Chair Updates
  3. Return to items in the preliminary recommendations flagged for further discussion during last week’s call (see here)
      1. Recommendation 7
      2. Recommendation 9.2
      3. Recommendation 13.1
      4. Recommendation 13.2
  4. Discussion of Recommendation 19 email thread (please see here)
  5. Begin review of items flagged in Proposed Revisions from Working Group members document (if any)
  6. AOB
      1. Next call: Tuesday 24 May 2022 at 16:00 UTC

 

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
GNSO-TPR mailing list
GNSO-TPR@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr