Dear WG members,
This is a friendly reminder to please complete the
short survey on ICANN-approved transfers before tomorrow’s meeting.
Thank you to those who have already completed the survey.
Best regards,
Christian, Julie, Berry, and Caitlin
From: GNSO-TPR <gnso-tpr-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Christian Wheeler <christian.wheeler@icann.org>
Date: Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 5:15 PM
To: "gnso-tpr@icann.org" <gnso-tpr@icann.org>
Subject: [GNSO-TPR] Proposed Agenda + Assignment - Meeting #105 Tuesday, 26 September 2023
Dear TPR WG members,
Please find below the proposed agenda for the next call on Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 16:00 UTC.
In preparation for next week’s call, Support Staff have created a
Survey
[docs.google.com] with questions aimed at clarifying WG member positions for discussion and conclusion of the ICANN-Approved Transfers topic. Prior to completing this Survey, please review the options laid out in the
Draft
Options Document and read the survey in its entirety.
Please complete this
Survey [docs.google.com] before our next call on Tuesday, 26 September.
Thank you all for your attention to the homework.
Kind regards,
Christian, Caitlin, Berry, and Julie
----------
Transfer Policy Review - Meeting #105
Proposed Agenda
26 September 2023
1. Welcome and Chair updates
2. Continue discussion of Charter Question i1 (Full Portfolio Transfers AKA Bulk Transfers) and Charter Question i2 (Change of Sponsorship AKA Partial Bulk Transfers)
i1) In light of these challenges described in section 3.1.7.2 of the Final
Issue Report [gnso.icann.org], should the required fee in Section I.B.2 of the Transfer
Policy be revisited or removed in certain circumstances?
·
Review Survey
[docs.google.com] Responses re: Draft Options
o
Remove the reference to fees entirely
o
Remove price ceiling (but allow for reasonable fee)
o
Retain price ceiling + Include language for apportionment of fees
o
Remove price ceiling + algorithm based on number of names transferred
o
Other?
i2) Should the scope of voluntary bulk transfers, including partial bulk transfers, be expanded and/or made uniform across all registry operators? If so, what types of rules and
considerations should govern voluntary bulk transfers and partial bulk transfers?
Should proposed BTAPPA updates apply to:
1. all registry operators (via an update to the Transfer Policy),
OR
2. all registry operators who offer the BTAPPA (via recommended updates to the BTAPPA)
3. AOB