TPR WG Action Item: CORD Recommendations Worksheet
Dear WG Members, We have reached an important point in our work where we need feedback from all working group members. We are nearing completion of our Group 1(b) Change of Registrant Data recommendations, and we will be finalizing them over the next few weeks. In short, if you are unable to participate over the next 2-3 weeks, please ensure your alternate(s) are available to participate on your behalf so that all representative groups share their perspectives on this important topic. The format under which we will be gathering feedback should be familiar to many of you. Support Staff has compiled the draft preliminary recommendations in this Group 1(b) Recommendations for Initial Report worksheet<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit>. The yellow highlighted text denotes text that Support Staff has edited based on feedback from the last meeting. By Tuesday, 9 April, we ask that all Working Group members: 1. Please review the draft preliminary recommendations<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit> in detail. 2. Using the tables provided (starting on p.9 of the worksheet<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit>), please identify any recommendations you believe should be changed. The tables contemplate levels of support (or lack of support): * Cannot live with the recommendation as written - this means that, unless significantly altered, your group cannot live with the text being included in the Initial Report * Could live with, but would prefer a change * Grammatical/typographical edits * Support recommendation as written 1. If you do not agree with the current text or believe edits are necessary, please identify the category (can’t live with, could live with but prefer edited text, or grammatical change), and propose alternate text. 2. If you can support the recommendation as written, please also affirmatively indicate your support in the green table. 3. Please provide your feedback by group, rather than in an individual capacity. We will be using the next 2-3 weeks to go over proposed updated text (if any). We ask all groups to review the recommendations to ensure you are comfortable with the proposed text for purposes of inclusion in the Initial Report. While we do plan to have additional time to review the comprehensive report as a whole (including Group 1(a) and Group 2), the time to raise fundamental issues with the Group 1(b) text is now. Thank you for your attention and participation. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry, Julie, Feodora, and Christian
To socialize this with our constituencies, it would be very helpful to have an Executive Summary of how the recommended policy changes the existing policy. Does Staff have a draft of that please? I previously raised an issue on the list about privacy/proxy changes, challenging the notion that moving from an identifiable registrant to a P/P (or vice versa) would be a Material Change, and should trigger a Notification. I do not believe there was ever any response on the list. I foresee this will be an issue for the IPC, so. if anyone could briefly explain why such a change is recommended to be outside the scope of this new policy, that explanation would be very helpful and appreciated. Thank you, Mike [image: Logo] Mike Rodenbaugh address: 548 Market Street, Box 55819 San Francisco, CA 94104 email: mike@rodenbaugh.com phone: +1 (415) 738-8087 *WORLD TRADEMARK REVIEW "WTR 1000" Top Global TM Counsel* *2012 to present [Book a Meeting <https://www.cloudhq.net/meeting/7FBRTNackKNkI0OKKZgn>]* On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 4:41 PM Christian Wheeler < christian.wheeler@icann.org> wrote:
Dear WG Members,
We have reached an important point in our work where *we need feedback from all working group members. *
We are nearing completion of our Group 1(b) Change of Registrant Data recommendations, and we will be finalizing them over the next few weeks. *In short, if you are unable to participate over the next 2-3 weeks, please ensure your alternate(s) are available to participate* on your behalf so that all representative groups share their perspectives on this important topic.
The format under which we will be gathering feedback should be familiar to many of you. Support Staff has compiled the draft preliminary recommendations in this Group 1(b) Recommendations for Initial Report worksheet <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit>. The yellow highlighted text denotes text that Support Staff has edited based on feedback from the last meeting.
By *Tuesday, 9 April**,* we ask that all Working Group members:
1. Please *review the **draft preliminary recommendations* <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit>* in detail*. 2. Using the tables provided (starting on p.9 of the worksheet <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit>), please *identify any recommendations you believe should be changed*. The tables contemplate levels of support (or lack of support):
1. Cannot live with the recommendation as written - this means that, unless significantly altered, your group cannot live with the text being included in the Initial Report 2. Could live with, but would prefer a change 3. Grammatical/typographical edits 4. Support recommendation as written
3. If you do not agree with the current text or believe edits are necessary, please identify the category (can’t live with, could live with but prefer edited text, or grammatical change), and *propose alternate text*. 4. If you can support the recommendation as written, please *also affirmatively indicate your support *in the green table. 5. Please *provide your feedback by group*, rather than in an individual capacity.
We will be using the next 2-3 weeks to go over proposed updated text (if any). We ask all groups to review the recommendations to ensure *you are comfortable with the proposed text for purposes of inclusion in the Initial Report. *
While we do plan to have additional time to review the comprehensive report as a whole (including Group 1(a) and Group 2), *the time to raise fundamental issues with the Group 1(b) text is now. *
Thank you for your attention and participation.
Best regards,
Caitlin, Berry, Julie, Feodora, and Christian _______________________________________________ GNSO-TPR mailing list GNSO-TPR@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr
Hi Mike, When the COR policy was implemented in 2016, it quickly became apparent that enabling/disabling privacy/proxy services would trigger the COR process. At the time, to transfer a domain name, a registrant would need to remove the P/P service prior to transfer to facilitate the gaining registrar obtaining the registrant’s email address for the gaining FOA. The COR was thus being triggered when the underlying customer information was not being changed, and that led to significant problems for registrars. The GNSO Council wrote to the ICANN Board on 1 December 2016 requesting that this obligation be deferred (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/bladel-to-crocker-01dec...), and on 21 December 2016 ICANN granted the deferral (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/crocker-to-bladel-21dec...). The obligation to do the COR (or now CORD) process for enabling/disabling P/P services has not been a requirement for over six years. The proposed changes to the CORD to make this exemption part of the policy is just reflecting the longstanding environment (which in practice is just deferring enforcing the obligations). Nothing new will result. Please let me know if this answers your question, and whether you need additional information. Regards, Owen
On Mar 29, 2024, at 09:55, Mike Rodenbaugh <mike@rodenbaugh.com> wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. To socialize this with our constituencies, it would be very helpful to have an Executive Summary of how the recommended policy changes the existing policy. Does Staff have a draft of that please?
I previously raised an issue on the list about privacy/proxy changes, challenging the notion that moving from an identifiable registrant to a P/P (or vice versa) would be a Material Change, and should trigger a Notification. I do not believe there was ever any response on the list. I foresee this will be an issue for the IPC, so. if anyone could briefly explain why such a change is recommended to be outside the scope of this new policy, that explanation would be very helpful and appreciated.
Thank you, Mike
Mike Rodenbaugh address: 548 Market Street, Box 55819 San Francisco, CA 94104 email: mike@rodenbaugh.com <mailto:mike@rodenbaugh.com> phone: +1 (415) 738-8087 WORLD TRADEMARK REVIEW "WTR 1000" Top Global TM Counsel 2012 to present [Book a Meeting <https://www.cloudhq.net/meeting/7FBRTNackKNkI0OKKZgn>]
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 4:41 PM Christian Wheeler <christian.wheeler@icann.org <mailto:christian.wheeler@icann.org>> wrote:
Dear WG Members,
We have reached an important point in our work where we need feedback from all working group members.
We are nearing completion of our Group 1(b) Change of Registrant Data recommendations, and we will be finalizing them over the next few weeks. In short, if you are unable to participate over the next 2-3 weeks, please ensure your alternate(s) are available to participate on your behalf so that all representative groups share their perspectives on this important topic.
The format under which we will be gathering feedback should be familiar to many of you. Support Staff has compiled the draft preliminary recommendations in this Group 1(b) Recommendations for Initial Report worksheet <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit>. The yellow highlighted text denotes text that Support Staff has edited based on feedback from the last meeting.
By Tuesday, 9 April, we ask that all Working Group members:
Please review the draft preliminary recommendations <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit> in detail. Using the tables provided (starting on p.9 of the worksheet <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit>), please identify any recommendations you believe should be changed. The tables contemplate levels of support (or lack of support):
Cannot live with the recommendation as written - this means that, unless significantly altered, your group cannot live with the text being included in the Initial Report Could live with, but would prefer a change Grammatical/typographical edits Support recommendation as written
If you do not agree with the current text or believe edits are necessary, please identify the category (can’t live with, could live with but prefer edited text, or grammatical change), and propose alternate text. If you can support the recommendation as written, please also affirmatively indicate your support in the green table. Please provide your feedback by group, rather than in an individual capacity.
We will be using the next 2-3 weeks to go over proposed updated text (if any). We ask all groups to review the recommendations to ensureyou are comfortable with the proposed text for purposes of inclusion in the Initial Report.
While we do plan to have additional time to review the comprehensive report as a whole (including Group 1(a) and Group 2), the time to raise fundamental issues with the Group 1(b) text is now.
Thank you for your attention and participation.
Best regards, Caitlin, Berry, Julie, Feodora, and Christian
_______________________________________________ GNSO-TPR mailing list GNSO-TPR@icann.org <mailto:GNSO-TPR@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. ********************
_______________________________________________ GNSO-TPR mailing list GNSO-TPR@icann.org <mailto:GNSO-TPR@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr
Hi Owen, that is a very helpful answer to my question. Thank you! [image: Logo] Mike Rodenbaugh address: 548 Market Street, Box 55819 San Francisco, CA 94104 email: mike@rodenbaugh.com phone: +1 (415) 738-8087 *WORLD TRADEMARK REVIEW "WTR 1000" Top Global TM Counsel* *2012 to present [Book a Meeting <https://www.cloudhq.net/meeting/mike@rodenbaugh.com>]* On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 3:42 PM Owen Smigelski <owen.smigelski@namecheap.com> wrote:
Hi Mike,
When the COR policy was implemented in 2016, it quickly became apparent that enabling/disabling privacy/proxy services would trigger the COR process. At the time, to transfer a domain name, a registrant would need to remove the P/P service prior to transfer to facilitate the gaining registrar obtaining the registrant’s email address for the gaining FOA. The COR was thus being triggered when the underlying customer information was not being changed, and that led to significant problems for registrars.
The GNSO Council wrote to the ICANN Board on 1 December 2016 requesting that this obligation be deferred ( https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/bladel-to-crocker-01dec...), and on 21 December 2016 ICANN granted the deferral ( https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/crocker-to-bladel-21dec... ).
The obligation to do the COR (or now CORD) process for enabling/disabling P/P services has not been a requirement for over six years. The proposed changes to the CORD to make this exemption part of the policy is just reflecting the longstanding environment (which in practice is just deferring enforcing the obligations). Nothing new will result.
Please let me know if this answers your question, and whether you need additional information.
Regards,
Owen
On Mar 29, 2024, at 09:55, Mike Rodenbaugh <mike@rodenbaugh.com> wrote:
*CAUTION: **This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.* To socialize this with our constituencies, it would be very helpful to have an Executive Summary of how the recommended policy changes the existing policy. Does Staff have a draft of that please?
I previously raised an issue on the list about privacy/proxy changes, challenging the notion that moving from an identifiable registrant to a P/P (or vice versa) would be a Material Change, and should trigger a Notification. I do not believe there was ever any response on the list. I foresee this will be an issue for the IPC, so. if anyone could briefly explain why such a change is recommended to be outside the scope of this new policy, that explanation would be very helpful and appreciated.
Thank you, Mike
[image: Logo] Mike Rodenbaugh address: 548 Market Street, Box 55819 San Francisco, CA 94104 email: mike@rodenbaugh.com phone: +1 (415) 738-8087 *WORLD TRADEMARK REVIEW "WTR 1000" Top Global TM Counsel* *2012 to present [Book a Meeting <https://www.cloudhq.net/meeting/7FBRTNackKNkI0OKKZgn>]*
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 4:41 PM Christian Wheeler < christian.wheeler@icann.org> wrote:
Dear WG Members,
We have reached an important point in our work where *we need feedback from all working group members. *
We are nearing completion of our Group 1(b) Change of Registrant Data recommendations, and we will be finalizing them over the next few weeks. *In short, if you are unable to participate over the next 2-3 weeks, please ensure your alternate(s) are available to participate* on your behalf so that all representative groups share their perspectives on this important topic.
The format under which we will be gathering feedback should be familiar to many of you. Support Staff has compiled the draft preliminary recommendations in this Group 1(b) Recommendations for Initial Report worksheet <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit>. The yellow highlighted text denotes text that Support Staff has edited based on feedback from the last meeting.
By *Tuesday, 9 April**,* we ask that all Working Group members:
1. Please *review the **draft preliminary recommendations* <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit>* in detail*. 2. Using the tables provided (starting on p.9 of the worksheet <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit>), please *identify any recommendations you believe should be changed*. The tables contemplate levels of support (or lack of support):
1. Cannot live with the recommendation as written - this means that, unless significantly altered, your group cannot live with the text being included in the Initial Report 2. Could live with, but would prefer a change 3. Grammatical/typographical edits 4. Support recommendation as written
3. If you do not agree with the current text or believe edits are necessary, please identify the category (can’t live with, could live with but prefer edited text, or grammatical change), and *propose alternate text*. 4. If you can support the recommendation as written, please *also affirmatively indicate your support *in the green table. 5. Please *provide your feedback by group*, rather than in an individual capacity.
We will be using the next 2-3 weeks to go over proposed updated text (if any). We ask all groups to review the recommendations to ensure*you are comfortable with the proposed text for purposes of inclusion in the Initial Report. *
While we do plan to have additional time to review the comprehensive report as a whole (including Group 1(a) and Group 2), *the time to raise fundamental issues with the Group 1(b) text is now. *
Thank you for your attention and participation.
Best regards,
Caitlin, Berry, Julie, Feodora, and Christian _______________________________________________ GNSO-TPR mailing list GNSO-TPR@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr
******************** CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. ********************
_______________________________________________ GNSO-TPR mailing list GNSO-TPR@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr
Hello Everyone, Just wanted to provide a nudge to make sure that everyone is working on the homework to review the CORD Recommendations<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit> and fill-out the worksheet putting each CORD Recommendation into one of the four tables for your respective represented group. As staff mentioned on our last call, this is not the last opportunity to provide input, but we want to have as thorough of a review now versus trying to address later. Talk to everyone tomorrow. Thanks Roger ________________________________ From: GNSO-TPR <gnso-tpr-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Christian Wheeler <christian.wheeler@icann.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2024 3:41 PM To: gnso-tpr@icann.org <gnso-tpr@icann.org> Subject: [GNSO-TPR] TPR WG Action Item: CORD Recommendations Worksheet Some people who received this message don't often get email from christian.wheeler@icann.org. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Forward suspicious emails to isitbad@. Dear WG Members, We have reached an important point in our work where we need feedback from all working group members. We are nearing completion of our Group 1(b) Change of Registrant Data recommendations, and we will be finalizing them over the next few weeks. In short, if you are unable to participate over the next 2-3 weeks, please ensure your alternate(s) are available to participate on your behalf so that all representative groups share their perspectives on this important topic. The format under which we will be gathering feedback should be familiar to many of you. Support Staff has compiled the draft preliminary recommendations in this Group 1(b) Recommendations for Initial Report worksheet<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit>. The yellow highlighted text denotes text that Support Staff has edited based on feedback from the last meeting. By Tuesday, 9 April, we ask that all Working Group members: 1. Please review the draft preliminary recommendations<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit> in detail. 2. Using the tables provided (starting on p.9 of the worksheet<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit>), please identify any recommendations you believe should be changed. The tables contemplate levels of support (or lack of support): * Cannot live with the recommendation as written - this means that, unless significantly altered, your group cannot live with the text being included in the Initial Report * Could live with, but would prefer a change * Grammatical/typographical edits * Support recommendation as written 1. If you do not agree with the current text or believe edits are necessary, please identify the category (can’t live with, could live with but prefer edited text, or grammatical change), and propose alternate text. 2. If you can support the recommendation as written, please also affirmatively indicate your support in the green table. 3. Please provide your feedback by group, rather than in an individual capacity. We will be using the next 2-3 weeks to go over proposed updated text (if any). We ask all groups to review the recommendations to ensure you are comfortable with the proposed text for purposes of inclusion in the Initial Report. While we do plan to have additional time to review the comprehensive report as a whole (including Group 1(a) and Group 2), the time to raise fundamental issues with the Group 1(b) text is now. Thank you for your attention and participation. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry, Julie, Feodora, and Christian
Is there a draft Executive Summary of changes to the policy that we can use to socialize this with our constituencies, please? [image: Logo] Mike Rodenbaugh address: 548 Market Street, Box 55819 San Francisco, CA 94104 email: mike@rodenbaugh.com phone: +1 (415) 738-8087 *WORLD TRADEMARK REVIEW "WTR 1000" Top Global TM Counsel* *2012 to present [Book a Meeting <https://www.cloudhq.net/meeting/OEIhunFHiSXNYuQRN0Jj>]* On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:23 PM rcarney--- via GNSO-TPR <gnso-tpr@icann.org> wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Just wanted to provide a nudge to make sure that everyone is working on the homework to review the CORD Recommendations <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit> and fill-out the worksheet putting each CORD Recommendation into one of the four tables for your respective represented group.
As staff mentioned on our last call, this is not the last opportunity to provide input, but we want to have as thorough of a review now versus trying to address later.
Talk to everyone tomorrow.
Thanks Roger
------------------------------ *From:* GNSO-TPR <gnso-tpr-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Christian Wheeler <christian.wheeler@icann.org> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 27, 2024 3:41 PM *To:* gnso-tpr@icann.org <gnso-tpr@icann.org> *Subject:* [GNSO-TPR] TPR WG Action Item: CORD Recommendations Worksheet
Some people who received this message don't often get email from christian.wheeler@icann.org. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Forward suspicious emails to isitbad@.
Dear WG Members,
We have reached an important point in our work where *we need feedback from all working group members. *
We are nearing completion of our Group 1(b) Change of Registrant Data recommendations, and we will be finalizing them over the next few weeks. *In short, if you are unable to participate over the next 2-3 weeks, please ensure your alternate(s) are available to participate* on your behalf so that all representative groups share their perspectives on this important topic.
The format under which we will be gathering feedback should be familiar to many of you. Support Staff has compiled the draft preliminary recommendations in this Group 1(b) Recommendations for Initial Report worksheet <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit>. The yellow highlighted text denotes text that Support Staff has edited based on feedback from the last meeting.
By *Tuesday, 9 April**,* we ask that all Working Group members:
1. Please *review the **draft preliminary recommendations <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit>** in detail*. 2. Using the tables provided (starting on p.9 of the worksheet <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit>), please *identify any recommendations you believe should be changed*. The tables contemplate levels of support (or lack of support):
1. Cannot live with the recommendation as written - this means that, unless significantly altered, your group cannot live with the text being included in the Initial Report 2. Could live with, but would prefer a change 3. Grammatical/typographical edits 4. Support recommendation as written
3. If you do not agree with the current text or believe edits are necessary, please identify the category (can’t live with, could live with but prefer edited text, or grammatical change), and *propose alternate text*. 4. If you can support the recommendation as written, please *also affirmatively indicate your support *in the green table. 5. Please *provide your feedback by group*, rather than in an individual capacity.
We will be using the next 2-3 weeks to go over proposed updated text (if any). We ask all groups to review the recommendations to ensure *you are comfortable with the proposed text for purposes of inclusion in the Initial Report. *
While we do plan to have additional time to review the comprehensive report as a whole (including Group 1(a) and Group 2), *the time to raise fundamental issues with the Group 1(b) text is now. *
Thank you for your attention and participation.
Best regards,
Caitlin, Berry, Julie, Feodora, and Christian _______________________________________________ GNSO-TPR mailing list GNSO-TPR@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr
Hi Mike, We currently do not have a draft Executive Summary of the proposed recommendations coming from our discussions of the Group 1b charter questions, but the slides<https://static.sched.com/hosted_files/icann79/0e/SLIDES-change-of-registrant%20-tpr-group-1%28b%29-II-icann79-sessions.pdf> from ICANN79 do provide the four recommendations in whole and a brief impact statement with each (e.g. new rec; updated rec; removal of language; language update; etc.). Additionally, there is the rationale document<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DpDO2BYTl6TA7ApfPpG3Hpl13nrv4y4x9B3hImrx_Fc/edit>, that WG Members have been filling-in to document rational for each of the recommendations, that could be useful as well. Thanks Roger ________________________________ From: Mike Rodenbaugh <mike@rodenbaugh.com> Sent: Monday, April 1, 2024 1:56 PM To: Roger D Carney <rcarney@godaddy.com> Cc: gnso-tpr@icann.org <gnso-tpr@icann.org> Subject: Re: [GNSO-TPR] TPR WG Action Item: CORD Recommendations Worksheet Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Forward suspicious emails to isitbad@. Is there a draft Executive Summary of changes to the policy that we can use to socialize this with our constituencies, please? [Logo] Mike Rodenbaugh address: 548 Market Street, Box 55819 San Francisco, CA 94104 email: mike@rodenbaugh.com<mailto:mike@rodenbaugh.com> phone: +1 (415) 738-8087 WORLD TRADEMARK REVIEW "WTR 1000" Top Global TM Counsel 2012 to present [Book a Meeting<https://www.cloudhq.net/meeting/OEIhunFHiSXNYuQRN0Jj>] On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:23 PM rcarney--- via GNSO-TPR <gnso-tpr@icann.org<mailto:gnso-tpr@icann.org>> wrote: Hello Everyone, Just wanted to provide a nudge to make sure that everyone is working on the homework to review the CORD Recommendations<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit> and fill-out the worksheet putting each CORD Recommendation into one of the four tables for your respective represented group. As staff mentioned on our last call, this is not the last opportunity to provide input, but we want to have as thorough of a review now versus trying to address later. Talk to everyone tomorrow. Thanks Roger ________________________________ From: GNSO-TPR <gnso-tpr-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-tpr-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Christian Wheeler <christian.wheeler@icann.org<mailto:christian.wheeler@icann.org>> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2024 3:41 PM To: gnso-tpr@icann.org<mailto:gnso-tpr@icann.org> <gnso-tpr@icann.org<mailto:gnso-tpr@icann.org>> Subject: [GNSO-TPR] TPR WG Action Item: CORD Recommendations Worksheet Some people who received this message don't often get email from christian.wheeler@icann.org<mailto:christian.wheeler@icann.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Forward suspicious emails to isitbad@. Dear WG Members, We have reached an important point in our work where we need feedback from all working group members. We are nearing completion of our Group 1(b) Change of Registrant Data recommendations, and we will be finalizing them over the next few weeks. In short, if you are unable to participate over the next 2-3 weeks, please ensure your alternate(s) are available to participate on your behalf so that all representative groups share their perspectives on this important topic. The format under which we will be gathering feedback should be familiar to many of you. Support Staff has compiled the draft preliminary recommendations in this Group 1(b) Recommendations for Initial Report worksheet<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit>. The yellow highlighted text denotes text that Support Staff has edited based on feedback from the last meeting. By Tuesday, 9 April, we ask that all Working Group members: 1. Please review the draft preliminary recommendations<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit> in detail. 2. Using the tables provided (starting on p.9 of the worksheet<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit>), please identify any recommendations you believe should be changed. The tables contemplate levels of support (or lack of support): * Cannot live with the recommendation as written - this means that, unless significantly altered, your group cannot live with the text being included in the Initial Report * Could live with, but would prefer a change * Grammatical/typographical edits * Support recommendation as written 1. If you do not agree with the current text or believe edits are necessary, please identify the category (can’t live with, could live with but prefer edited text, or grammatical change), and propose alternate text. 2. If you can support the recommendation as written, please also affirmatively indicate your support in the green table. 3. Please provide your feedback by group, rather than in an individual capacity. We will be using the next 2-3 weeks to go over proposed updated text (if any). We ask all groups to review the recommendations to ensure you are comfortable with the proposed text for purposes of inclusion in the Initial Report. While we do plan to have additional time to review the comprehensive report as a whole (including Group 1(a) and Group 2), the time to raise fundamental issues with the Group 1(b) text is now. Thank you for your attention and participation. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry, Julie, Feodora, and Christian _______________________________________________ GNSO-TPR mailing list GNSO-TPR@icann.org<mailto:GNSO-TPR@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr
Thank you Roger, this is very helpful. [image: Logo] Mike Rodenbaugh address: 548 Market Street, Box 55819 San Francisco, CA 94104 email: mike@rodenbaugh.com phone: +1 (415) 738-8087 *WORLD TRADEMARK REVIEW "WTR 1000" Top Global TM Counsel* *2012 to present [Book a Meeting <https://www.cloudhq.net/meeting/mike@rodenbaugh.com>]* On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 11:08 AM rcarney@godaddy.com <rcarney@godaddy.com> wrote:
Hi Mike,
We currently do not have a draft Executive Summary of the proposed recommendations coming from our discussions of the Group 1b charter questions, but the slides <https://static.sched.com/hosted_files/icann79/0e/SLIDES-change-of-registrant%20-tpr-group-1%28b%29-II-icann79-sessions.pdf> from ICANN79 do provide the four recommendations in whole and a brief impact statement with each (e.g. new rec; updated rec; removal of language; language update; etc.). Additionally, there is the rationale document <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DpDO2BYTl6TA7ApfPpG3Hpl13nrv4y4x9B3hImrx_Fc/edit>, that WG Members have been filling-in to document rational for each of the recommendations, that could be useful as well.
Thanks Roger ------------------------------ *From:* Mike Rodenbaugh <mike@rodenbaugh.com> *Sent:* Monday, April 1, 2024 1:56 PM *To:* Roger D Carney <rcarney@godaddy.com> *Cc:* gnso-tpr@icann.org <gnso-tpr@icann.org> *Subject:* Re: [GNSO-TPR] TPR WG Action Item: CORD Recommendations Worksheet
Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Forward suspicious emails to isitbad@.
Is there a draft Executive Summary of changes to the policy that we can use to socialize this with our constituencies, please?
[image: Logo]
Mike Rodenbaugh
address:
548 Market Street, Box 55819
San Francisco, CA 94104
email:
mike@rodenbaugh.com
phone:
+1 (415) 738-8087 *WORLD TRADEMARK REVIEW "WTR 1000" Top Global TM Counsel* *2012 to present [Book a Meeting <https://www.cloudhq.net/meeting/OEIhunFHiSXNYuQRN0Jj>]*
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:23 PM rcarney--- via GNSO-TPR <gnso-tpr@icann.org> wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Just wanted to provide a nudge to make sure that everyone is working on the homework to review the CORD Recommendations <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit> and fill-out the worksheet putting each CORD Recommendation into one of the four tables for your respective represented group.
As staff mentioned on our last call, this is not the last opportunity to provide input, but we want to have as thorough of a review now versus trying to address later.
Talk to everyone tomorrow.
Thanks Roger
------------------------------ *From:* GNSO-TPR <gnso-tpr-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Christian Wheeler <christian.wheeler@icann.org> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 27, 2024 3:41 PM *To:* gnso-tpr@icann.org <gnso-tpr@icann.org> *Subject:* [GNSO-TPR] TPR WG Action Item: CORD Recommendations Worksheet
Some people who received this message don't often get email from christian.wheeler@icann.org. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Forward suspicious emails to isitbad@.
Dear WG Members,
We have reached an important point in our work where *we need feedback from all working group members. *
We are nearing completion of our Group 1(b) Change of Registrant Data recommendations, and we will be finalizing them over the next few weeks. *In short, if you are unable to participate over the next 2-3 weeks, please ensure your alternate(s) are available to participate* on your behalf so that all representative groups share their perspectives on this important topic.
The format under which we will be gathering feedback should be familiar to many of you. Support Staff has compiled the draft preliminary recommendations in this Group 1(b) Recommendations for Initial Report worksheet <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit>. The yellow highlighted text denotes text that Support Staff has edited based on feedback from the last meeting.
By *Tuesday, 9 April**,* we ask that all Working Group members:
1. Please *review the **draft preliminary recommendations <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit>** in detail*. 2. Using the tables provided (starting on p.9 of the worksheet <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwEdbE/edit>), please *identify any recommendations you believe should be changed*. The tables contemplate levels of support (or lack of support):
1. Cannot live with the recommendation as written - this means that, unless significantly altered, your group cannot live with the text being included in the Initial Report 2. Could live with, but would prefer a change 3. Grammatical/typographical edits 4. Support recommendation as written
3. If you do not agree with the current text or believe edits are necessary, please identify the category (can’t live with, could live with but prefer edited text, or grammatical change), and *propose alternate text*. 4. If you can support the recommendation as written, please *also affirmatively indicate your support *in the green table. 5. Please *provide your feedback by group*, rather than in an individual capacity.
We will be using the next 2-3 weeks to go over proposed updated text (if any). We ask all groups to review the recommendations to ensure *you are comfortable with the proposed text for purposes of inclusion in the Initial Report. *
While we do plan to have additional time to review the comprehensive report as a whole (including Group 1(a) and Group 2), *the time to raise fundamental issues with the Group 1(b) text is now. *
Thank you for your attention and participation.
Best regards,
Caitlin, Berry, Julie, Feodora, and Christian _______________________________________________ GNSO-TPR mailing list GNSO-TPR@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr
participants (4)
-
Christian Wheeler -
Mike Rodenbaugh -
Owen Smigelski -
rcarney＠godaddy.com