Post Call | Transfer Policy Review PDP WG | Tuesday, 22 March 2022
Dear all, All recordings for the Transfer Policy Review PDP WG call held on Tuesday, 22 March 2022 at 16:00 UTC can be found on the agenda wiki page <https://community.icann.org/x/KBAiCw> (attendance included) and the GNSO Master calendar [gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calend...>. These include: * Attendance * Audio recording * Zoom chat archive * Zoom recording (including audio, visual, rough transcript) * Transcript As a reminder only members and alternates can join the call as a Panelist, observers can join as an Attendee to listen. For additional information, you may consult the mailing list archives <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-tpr/> and the main wiki page<https://community.icann.org/x/P4aUCQ>. Thank you. With kind regards, Julie
Dear Julie, The minutes from the call connected to my update from the At-Large discussion on the transfer locks. The sentence “The results showed support for a 60-day period for locks as well as 30 days” is not correct. More accurate is that the “majority of the CPWG members were in favor of reducing the lock period for post-create and post transfer locks”. The poll results – as distributed to the GNSO-TPR mailing list, show that the 60 days alternative had 7% of the votes, while the 10 days and 30 days lock were favored. I hope the minutes can be updated accordingly. Regards, Steinar Grøtterød From: GNSO-TPR <gnso-tpr-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Julie Bisland <julie.bisland@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 22 March 2022 at 18:58 To: gnso-tpr@icann.org <gnso-tpr@icann.org> Cc: gnso-secs@icann.org <gnso-secs@icann.org> Subject: [GNSO-TPR] Post Call | Transfer Policy Review PDP WG | Tuesday, 22 March 2022 Dear all, All recordings for the Transfer Policy Review PDP WG call held on Tuesday, 22 March 2022 at 16:00 UTC can be found on the agenda wiki page <https://community.icann.org/x/KBAiCw> (attendance included) and the GNSO Master calendar [gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calend...>. These include: * Attendance * Audio recording * Zoom chat archive * Zoom recording (including audio, visual, rough transcript) * Transcript As a reminder only members and alternates can join the call as a Panelist, observers can join as an Attendee to listen. For additional information, you may consult the mailing list archives <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-tpr/> and the main wiki page<https://community.icann.org/x/P4aUCQ>. Thank you. With kind regards, Julie
Dear Steinar, Thank you for reading the notes so thoroughly and for your very helpful clarification! Staff will add your clarifying language to the notes accordingly on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/TPRPDP/2022-03-22+Transfer+Policy+Review.... As a reminder to all WG members, staff would like to emphasize that the action items and brief notes sent after the meetings are not “minutes” and thus are not meant to be a substitute for, or transcription of, the recording. As a record of the WG’s deliberations, WG members are encouraged to refer to the audio recordings posted to the wiki. Thanks again Steinar for your help. With kind regards, Emily, Caitlin, Berry, and Julie From: GNSO-TPR <gnso-tpr-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Steinar Grøtterød <steinar@recito.no> Date: Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 3:00 AM To: Julie Bisland <julie.bisland@icann.org>, "gnso-tpr@icann.org" <gnso-tpr@icann.org> Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org" <gnso-secs@icann.org> Subject: Re: [GNSO-TPR] Post Call | Transfer Policy Review PDP WG | Tuesday, 22 March 2022 Dear Julie, The minutes from the call connected to my update from the At-Large discussion on the transfer locks. The sentence “The results showed support for a 60-day period for locks as well as 30 days” is not correct. More accurate is that the “majority of the CPWG members were in favor of reducing the lock period for post-create and post transfer locks”. The poll results – as distributed to the GNSO-TPR mailing list, show that the 60 days alternative had 7% of the votes, while the 10 days and 30 days lock were favored. I hope the minutes can be updated accordingly. Regards, Steinar Grøtterød From: GNSO-TPR <gnso-tpr-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Julie Bisland <julie.bisland@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 22 March 2022 at 18:58 To: gnso-tpr@icann.org <gnso-tpr@icann.org> Cc: gnso-secs@icann.org <gnso-secs@icann.org> Subject: [GNSO-TPR] Post Call | Transfer Policy Review PDP WG | Tuesday, 22 March 2022 Dear all, All recordings for the Transfer Policy Review PDP WG call held on Tuesday, 22 March 2022 at 16:00 UTC can be found on the agenda wiki page <https://community.icann.org/x/KBAiCw> (attendance included) and the GNSO Master calendar [gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calend...>. These include: * Attendance * Audio recording * Zoom chat archive * Zoom recording (including audio, visual, rough transcript) * Transcript As a reminder only members and alternates can join the call as a Panelist, observers can join as an Attendee to listen. For additional information, you may consult the mailing list archives <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-tpr/> and the main wiki page<https://community.icann.org/x/P4aUCQ>. Thank you. With kind regards, Julie
participants (3)
-
Julie Bisland -
Julie Hedlund -
Steinar Grøtterød