What about "price not to exceed the cost of the regostrar manually processing the same transfers" as another idea? On Thu, Nov 2, 2023, 7:00 AM Theo Geurts <transferpdp@dcx.nl> wrote:

Thanks Roger,

Regarding the 50k or whatever pricing we will put in the recommendations after our discussions last time.

I suggest that the price should be reasonable. Or to some wording to that extent. My thinking is here that the price will evolve to something reasonable anyway. And the alternative is most likely not pretty.

The alternative is that the WG sets a price through a policy recommendation. I think that will be a wrong move.

First there is all these trade laws in the US, but I leave that to ICANN legal.

Second, a working group setting a price on registry operations through a PDP? Do we want to open up that door? Where is that going to end? Imagine a WG setting a price on how much a UDRP provider can charge? If a WG can set a price on a TOSS, why stop there in future PDP's.

I think we need to stay clear from mentioning any price tag within the recommendations.

Best, Theo

On Wed, Nov 1, 2023, at 2:23 PM, rcarney--- via GNSO-TPR wrote:

Hello Everyone,

Just a reminder to review the materials below in preparation for our call next Tuesday, we want to make sure everyone is on the same understanding as we move forward.

As we were reminded of in Hamburg, we have been at this for a while and with the team's dedication we have fortunately made great progress so far. Let's stay focused as we approach our last big topic, Change of Registrant (CoR) and get this wrapped up next year.

Thanks Roger

------------------------------

*From:* GNSO-TPR <gnso-tpr-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen@icann.org> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 24, 2023 3:22 AM *To:* gnso-tpr@icann.org <gnso-tpr@icann.org> *Subject:* [GNSO-TPR] For your review: TPR recap recording + documents

Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Forward suspicious emails to isitbad@.

Dear TPR WG members,

It was great to see many of you in Hamburg.

As discussed during our session, Support Staff has been working with Leadership to prepare some materials to refresh the group on the preliminary agreements we have made over the last 980 days since the Council initiated this PDP. (For those of you who did not attend the ICANN78 session, Berry informed us that we are about to close in on 1000 days of work.)

Since it’s been a while (and thank you to everyone for sticking with this work!), we thought it would be helpful to have a brief refresher before we pivot back to our charter questions on Change of Registrant (Group 1(b)). Our *Tuesday, 7 November 2023 *meeting will be dedicated to this refresher exercise.

To prepare for the call, please review the following materials in advance:

- the recording from the 17 January WG meeting <https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/M9Q6l-3ucT4SL0OiDJ0zQc9EmlMzB84MywmdUKDQqgAqglMNFztxEGAqiGIPLFzkXcRDbHgD7papQS3J.4wrRUwXfOAzd2nqW>, where Berry presented the swim lane diagram - an updated swim lane diagram, which shows how the recommendations interrelate (attached) - a slide deck, which provides an overview of the recommendations the group has agreed on to date (attached)

We recommend listening to the Zoom recording <https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/M9Q6l-3ucT4SL0OiDJ0zQc9EmlMzB84MywmdUKDQqgAqglMNFztxEGAqiGIPLFzkXcRDbHgD7papQS3J.4wrRUwXfOAzd2nqW> first before reviewing the updated swim lane and the slide deck as these will make more sense after a refresher from the recording.

Thank you.

Best regards,

Christian, Julie, Berry, and Caitlin

_______________________________________________ GNSO-TPR mailing list GNSO-TPR@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr

*Attachments:*

- TPR Swimlane_v1.4.pdf - TPR WG Recap.pdf - ATT00001.txt

_______________________________________________ GNSO-TPR mailing list GNSO-TPR@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr