Thanks
Berry and Caitlin for your work on this.
I
have added a few more tracked changes, sorry. Most of the
changes are for clarity, things that were hard to see when
we had the commented version in progress.
I
do note
Tom's comment on the AuthInfo management section and
I think we would benefit from discussing that a bit. My
assumption was that each row on the issues chart indicated
a different topic and thus the bigger ones would be
approached in individual PDPs, and it sounds like that's
how Tom was reading it also, but Berry has explained that
each row is a different policy topic but not necessarily a
different PDP.
I
would propose that we do two things: 1, combine the FOA
and AuthInfo rows into one topic (I think they're too
intertwined to be separated) and 2, add a sentence to the
paragraph immediately preceding the chart to explain that
the rows may be combined depending on what the GNSO
Council thinks makes sense. I think we could propose that
some be approached together (maybe TEAC and TDRP?) also.
What
do you think? Thanks!
--
Sarah Wyld
Domains Product Team
Tucows
+1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392
On 3/30/2020 10:49 PM, Caitlin Tubergen
wrote:
Dear
Scoping Team Members:
Further
to Support Staff’s action to circulate a clean version
of the Scoping Paper to the Team by COB today, please
find the link:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit#.
As a
reminder, please provide additional and final edits by
COB Thursday, 2 April. Support Staff will then
incorporate the proposed edits and send the paper to the
GNSO Council by
Monday, 6 April.
In
addition, please remember to keep the your RrSG GNSO
Councilors colleagues apprised of the Scoping Team's
progress.
Thank
you.
Best
regards,
Berry
and Caitlin
_______________________________________________
GNSO-TPRST mailing list
GNSO-TPRST@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tprst