On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Francisco Arias <francisco.arias@icann.org> wrote:
On 1/12/16, 9:59 AM, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> wrote:
What implementation are you suggesting to be deferred?
Are we talking about more than one? As I understand it, the profile has been written to describe proposed RDAP implementation requirements for gTLD registries and registrars. I'm asking if registries and registrars that wish to support tiered access will be able to defer an RDAP implementation until an agreement provision, waiver, or Consensus Policy that allows tiered access for more than 3 out of 901 gTLDs is in place.
Just so that I understand, why would you like a registry/registrar to defer their RDAP implementation until there is a tiered access provision/policy?
I don't think Scott is desiring such a thing. I think he is asking if a registry or registrar can use the lack of provision, waiver, etc... as a reason not to deploy RDAP. -andy