March 26, 2014
6:54 p.m.
On Mar 26, 2014, at 7:31 AM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
Yes, I realize that, but if a registry's processes are so sloppy that it doesn't remember whose CZDS access applications it's approved, it's hard to have a lot of sympathy.
Why would your "un-sloppy" process need to "remember" something that is being kept track of in a database, with an actionable audit trail? You can have a perfect process that does depend on the existence of a database. What happens when you lose the little black notebook where you kept track of who you authorized access to what? Or do you build yet another system to keep a redundant counter around? Best regards -lem