On 1/9/16, 6:40 AM, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: gtld-tech-bounces@icann.org On Behalf Of Francisco Arias Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 6:53 PM To: Andrew Newton; Gannon, James-1 Cc: gtld-tech@icann.org Subject: Re: [gtld-tech] Draft RDAP Operational Profile for gTLD Registries and Registrars
I think there is perhaps a misunderstanding. The current profile proposal does support/allow for tiered access, as long as an agreement provision, waiver, or Consensus Policy supports/allows such thing (see section 1.4.11 of the proposal).
Francisco, how many gTLDs have such provisions in place?
Scott, there are three gTLDs (.cat, .name, and .tel) with tiered-access provisions as described in the public comment landing page for the gTLD RDAP profile at https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rdap-profile-2015-12-03-en.
Will those that do not be able to defer implementation until the needed "agreement provision, waiver, or Consensus Policy" terms are in place?
I don’t understand this, could you elaborate? Regards, -- Francisco