Sorry, the note below might be confusing. There are several members of the EWG that volunteered for the PDP. The topic *will* come up, so Francisco's suggestion is a good one. Get involved. Scott
On Jan 29, 2016, at 6:16 PM, Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com> wrote:
On Jan 29, 2016, at 5:40 PM, Francisco Arias <francisco.arias@icann.org> wrote:
On 1/29/16, 9:25 AM, "gtld-tech-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Andrew Sullivan" <gtld-tech-bounces@icann.org on behalf of asullivan@dyn.com> wrote:
[snip]
With the exception of Scott, I don’t see any of the people that have complained about the lack of differentiated access in RDDS in the RDS list at https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=56986659. If you care about this issue, please participate in RDS.
It's not in that archive, but you should re-read the EWG report and the comments received thus far on the proposed profile. I'm not alone.
Scott