Dear Friends,
I have some questions about the ICANN73 planning that I would like to share
with you:
The plenary proposed Session "Moving Forward with the Global Public
Interest Framework": by reading the summary of this session I can hardly
find the difference between this session and the "The Global Public
Interest at ICANN - An Update
<https://72.schedule.icann.org/meetings/y99Xbhof3BbxfCQhY#/?limit=10&sortByF…>"
session held during the ICANN72 . I'm personally with the proposal to go
forward and discuss the application of the GPI Framework on some
specific issues, such use cases will give us the necessary expertise in
applying GPI Framework. Note that the SSAD and SubPro cases were slightly
treated during the ICANN72 session.
In another hand I wonder if the schedule
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wANaaNHUD2hBwTRvaykjIZQoAPd-zw4OCcj…>
presented
during the last call, should take in account the Middle east space
<https://icannwiki.org/ICANN_ME_SPACE> session, it happen that
this session mostly animated by ALAC members is in conflicts with others
ALAC session (for example during ICANN66 conflict with ALAC board session
) , so I suggest that the ALAC schedule take in account this cross
community interaction session and avoid any conflicts with ,specifically
with the Joint AFRALO-AfrICANN Meeting since both sessions
generally attract same attendees from africa and middle east regions .
Finally, with the hope that I am still on time ,I will iterate my session
proposal about the ICANN Open Data platform
<https://opendata.icann.org/pages/home-page/> use and evolution, it could
be labeled under capacity building training label or
outreaching/Engagement Label.
Happy New Year
Chokri
