Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process
Dear IDN Working Group, A public comment period is now open on IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process (Interim Report). Please indicate if you think there should be an ALAC response to this document. Regarding the Final Report on User Experience related to the activation of IDN variant TLDs, if after the webinar scheduled on 13 February you feel that there should be a response on this issue, please flag it immediately. Best regards, Rinalia Abdul Rahim sent via galaxy tab ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "ICANN At-Large Staff" <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Date: 6 Feb 2013 07:20 Subject: [ALAC-Announce] FW: ICANN News Alert -- Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process To: "alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org" < alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org> [http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/> News Alert http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-05feb13-en.htm ________________________________ Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process 5 February 2013 Forum Announcement: Comment Period Opens on Date: 5 February 2013 Categories/Tags: * Top-Level Domains * Policy Processes Purpose (Brief): In the framework of the ccNSO Policy Development Process on IDN ccTLD's the purpose of the Interim Report< http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/idn-ccpdp-interim-04feb13-en.pdf> [PDF, 556 KB] is to report on and seek feed-back on feasible recommendations for overall policy for the selection of IDN country code Top Level Domains strings (IDN ccTLD's) and the inclusion of IDN ccTLD managers in the ccNSO. The Interim Report builds on the Final Paper's of IDN ccPDP Working Groups 1 and 2, which have been open for public comment. Public Comment Box Link: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/idn-ccpdp-05feb13-en.htm This message was sent to matt.ashtiani@icann.org<mailto: matt.ashtiani@icann.org> from: ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Email Marketing by [http://app.icontact.com/images/icontact_tryFree.gif] < http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186> Manage Your Subscription < http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=24564788&l=6333&s=BCA3&m=904...
_______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
*Dear Rinalia,* * * *thank you for drawing attention to this. Having had an indirect connection with ccNSO matters (as Chair of the ccNSO Review), I'd like to offer 2 comments:* * * *- At this stage, I don't have any definitive view about whether there should be an ALAC response or not. The nature of the issue will certainly cause many people to leave comments, and these may or may not include a vigorous defense of the global public interest. If the latter were lacking, or insufficient, then ALAC should step in.* * * *- I'd like to make sure that the system remains open and fair, for instance between states sharing the same language(s), e.g. Arabic or Chinese. The issue is not unlike the one in the IDN Variants debate, where there was a tendency for certain states to claim (and act as if) a language or a script was theirs alone, forcing others to accept their national norms. It's quite possible that this problem may not arise, or that it has been settled. Do you share my concern?* * * *Best regards,* *Jean-Jacques. * 2013/2/6 Rinalia Abdul Rahim <rinalia.abdulrahim@gmail.com>
Dear IDN Working Group,
A public comment period is now open on IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process (Interim Report). Please indicate if you think there should be an ALAC response to this document.
Regarding the Final Report on User Experience related to the activation of IDN variant TLDs, if after the webinar scheduled on 13 February you feel that there should be a response on this issue, please flag it immediately.
Best regards,
Rinalia Abdul Rahim
sent via galaxy tab ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "ICANN At-Large Staff" <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Date: 6 Feb 2013 07:20 Subject: [ALAC-Announce] FW: ICANN News Alert -- Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process To: "alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org" < alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
[http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/> News Alert
http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-05feb13-en.htm
________________________________ Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process
5 February 2013
Forum Announcement: Comment Period Opens on Date: 5 February 2013 Categories/Tags:
* Top-Level Domains * Policy Processes
Purpose (Brief): In the framework of the ccNSO Policy Development Process on IDN ccTLD's the purpose of the Interim Report< http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/idn-ccpdp-interim-04feb13-en.pdf> [PDF, 556 KB] is to report on and seek feed-back on feasible recommendations for overall policy for the selection of IDN country code Top Level Domains strings (IDN ccTLD's) and the inclusion of IDN ccTLD managers in the ccNSO. The Interim Report builds on the Final Paper's of IDN ccPDP Working Groups 1 and 2, which have been open for public comment. Public Comment Box Link: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/idn-ccpdp-05feb13-en.htm
This message was sent to matt.ashtiani@icann.org<mailto: matt.ashtiani@icann.org> from:
ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
Email Marketing by [http://app.icontact.com/images/icontact_tryFree.gif] < http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186>
Manage Your Subscription <
http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=24564788&l=6333&s=BCA3&m=904...
_______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce
At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ IDN-WG mailing list IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
IDN WG Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+IDN+Policy
Dear Jean-Jacques, It is an important concern. Perhaps Cheryl Langdon-Orr (ALAC Liaison to the ccNSO) has some thoughts regarding what opportunities and mechanism exists within the ccNSO processes where the ALAC could/should intervene to ensure that the system remains fair and open. Best regards, Rinalia On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:26 AM, JJS <jjs.global@gmail.com> wrote:
*Dear Rinalia,* * * *thank you for drawing attention to this. Having had an indirect connection with ccNSO matters (as Chair of the ccNSO Review), I'd like to offer 2 comments:* * * *- At this stage, I don't have any definitive view about whether there should be an ALAC response or not. The nature of the issue will certainly cause many people to leave comments, and these may or may not include a vigorous defense of the global public interest. If the latter were lacking, or insufficient, then ALAC should step in.* * * *- I'd like to make sure that the system remains open and fair, for instance between states sharing the same language(s), e.g. Arabic or Chinese. The issue is not unlike the one in the IDN Variants debate, where there was a tendency for certain states to claim (and act as if) a language or a script was theirs alone, forcing others to accept their national norms. It's quite possible that this problem may not arise, or that it has been settled. Do you share my concern?* * * *Best regards,* *Jean-Jacques. * 2013/2/6 Rinalia Abdul Rahim <rinalia.abdulrahim@gmail.com>
Dear IDN Working Group,
A public comment period is now open on IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process (Interim Report). Please indicate if you think there should be an ALAC response to this document.
Regarding the Final Report on User Experience related to the activation of IDN variant TLDs, if after the webinar scheduled on 13 February you feel that there should be a response on this issue, please flag it immediately.
Best regards,
Rinalia Abdul Rahim
sent via galaxy tab ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "ICANN At-Large Staff" <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Date: 6 Feb 2013 07:20 Subject: [ALAC-Announce] FW: ICANN News Alert -- Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process To: "alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org" < alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
[http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/> News Alert
http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-05feb13-en.htm
________________________________ Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process
5 February 2013
Forum Announcement: Comment Period Opens on Date: 5 February 2013 Categories/Tags:
* Top-Level Domains * Policy Processes
Purpose (Brief): In the framework of the ccNSO Policy Development Process on IDN ccTLD's the purpose of the Interim Report< http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/idn-ccpdp-interim-04feb13-en.pdf> [PDF, 556 KB] is to report on and seek feed-back on feasible recommendations for overall policy for the selection of IDN country code Top Level Domains strings (IDN ccTLD's) and the inclusion of IDN ccTLD managers in the ccNSO. The Interim Report builds on the Final Paper's of IDN ccPDP Working Groups 1 and 2, which have been open for public comment. Public Comment Box Link: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/idn-ccpdp-05feb13-en.htm
This message was sent to matt.ashtiani@icann.org<mailto: matt.ashtiani@icann.org> from:
ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
Email Marketing by [http://app.icontact.com/images/icontact_tryFree.gif] < http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186>
Manage Your Subscription <
http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=24564788&l=6333&s=BCA3&m=904...
_______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce
At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ IDN-WG mailing list IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
IDN WG Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+IDN+Policy
In the last round of public comments, a few from this group had some comments on the issue of confusingly similar string. I wonder if they need to be raised again... perhaps those who raised it can provide further input.. Edmon
-----Original Message----- From: idn-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:idn-wg- bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rinalia Abdul Rahim Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2013 11:00 AM To: JJS Cc: No name Subject: Re: [IDN-WG] Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process
Dear Jean-Jacques,
It is an important concern. Perhaps Cheryl Langdon-Orr (ALAC Liaison to the ccNSO) has some thoughts regarding what opportunities and mechanism exists within the ccNSO processes where the ALAC could/should intervene to ensure that the system remains fair and open.
Best regards,
Rinalia
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:26 AM, JJS <jjs.global@gmail.com> wrote:
*Dear Rinalia,* * * *thank you for drawing attention to this. Having had an indirect connection with ccNSO matters (as Chair of the ccNSO Review), I'd like to offer 2 comments:* * * *- At this stage, I don't have any definitive view about whether there should be an ALAC response or not. The nature of the issue will certainly cause many people to leave comments, and these may or may not include a vigorous defense of the global public interest. If the latter were lacking, or insufficient, then ALAC should step in.* * * *- I'd like to make sure that the system remains open and fair, for instance between states sharing the same language(s), e.g. Arabic or Chinese. The issue is not unlike the one in the IDN Variants debate, where there was a tendency for certain states to claim (and act as if) a language or a script was theirs alone, forcing others to accept their national norms. It's quite possible that this problem may not arise, or that it has been settled. Do you share my concern?* * * *Best regards,* *Jean-Jacques. * 2013/2/6 Rinalia Abdul Rahim <rinalia.abdulrahim@gmail.com>
Dear IDN Working Group,
A public comment period is now open on IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process (Interim Report). Please indicate if you think there should be an ALAC response to this document.
Regarding the Final Report on User Experience related to the activation of IDN variant TLDs, if after the webinar scheduled on 13 February you feel that there should be a response on this issue, please flag it immediately.
Best regards,
Rinalia Abdul Rahim
sent via galaxy tab ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "ICANN At-Large Staff" <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Date: 6 Feb 2013 07:20 Subject: [ALAC-Announce] FW: ICANN News Alert -- Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process To: "alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org" < alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
[http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/> News Alert
http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-05feb13- en.ht m
________________________________ Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process
5 February 2013
Forum Announcement: Comment Period Opens on Date: 5 February 2013 Categories/Tags:
* Top-Level Domains * Policy Processes
Purpose (Brief): In the framework of the ccNSO Policy Development Process on IDN ccTLD's the purpose of the Interim Report< http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/idn-ccpdp-interim-04feb13-en.pdf
[PDF, 556 KB] is to report on and seek feed-back on feasible recommendations for overall policy for the selection of IDN country code Top Level Domains strings (IDN ccTLD's) and the inclusion of IDN ccTLD managers in the ccNSO. The Interim Report builds on the Final Paper's of IDN ccPDP Working Groups 1 and 2, which have been open for public comment. Public Comment Box Link: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/idn-ccpdp-05feb13- en.htm
This message was sent to matt.ashtiani@icann.org<mailto: matt.ashtiani@icann.org> from:
ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
Email Marketing by [http://app.icontact.com/images/icontact_tryFree.gif] < http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186>
Manage Your Subscription <
http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail- mprofile.pl?r=24564788&l=6333&s=BCA 3&m=904926&c=165637
_______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce
At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ IDN-WG mailing list IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
IDN WG Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+IDN+Policy
_______________________________________________ IDN-WG mailing list IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
IDN WG Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At- Large+IDN+Policy ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.2897 / Virus Database: 2639/6085 - Release Date: 02/06/13
Thanks, Edmon. I support to raise it again. Hong On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Edmon <edmon@isoc.hk> wrote:
In the last round of public comments, a few from this group had some comments on the issue of confusingly similar string. I wonder if they need to be raised again... perhaps those who raised it can provide further input.. Edmon
-----Original Message----- From: idn-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:idn-wg- bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rinalia Abdul Rahim Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2013 11:00 AM To: JJS Cc: No name Subject: Re: [IDN-WG] Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process
Dear Jean-Jacques,
It is an important concern. Perhaps Cheryl Langdon-Orr (ALAC Liaison to the ccNSO) has some thoughts regarding what opportunities and mechanism exists within the ccNSO processes where the ALAC could/should intervene to ensure that the system remains fair and open.
Best regards,
Rinalia
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:26 AM, JJS <jjs.global@gmail.com> wrote:
*Dear Rinalia,* * * *thank you for drawing attention to this. Having had an indirect connection with ccNSO matters (as Chair of the ccNSO Review), I'd like to offer 2 comments:* * * *- At this stage, I don't have any definitive view about whether there should be an ALAC response or not. The nature of the issue will certainly cause many people to leave comments, and these may or may not include a vigorous defense of the global public interest. If the latter were lacking, or insufficient, then ALAC should step in.* * * *- I'd like to make sure that the system remains open and fair, for instance between states sharing the same language(s), e.g. Arabic or Chinese. The issue is not unlike the one in the IDN Variants debate, where there was a tendency for certain states to claim (and act as if) a language or a script was theirs alone, forcing others to accept their national norms. It's quite possible that this problem may not arise, or that it has been settled. Do you share my concern?* * * *Best regards,* *Jean-Jacques. * 2013/2/6 Rinalia Abdul Rahim <rinalia.abdulrahim@gmail.com>
Dear IDN Working Group,
A public comment period is now open on IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process (Interim Report). Please indicate if you think there should be an ALAC response to this document.
Regarding the Final Report on User Experience related to the activation of IDN variant TLDs, if after the webinar scheduled on 13 February you feel that there should be a response on this issue, please flag it immediately.
Best regards,
Rinalia Abdul Rahim
sent via galaxy tab ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "ICANN At-Large Staff" <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Date: 6 Feb 2013 07:20 Subject: [ALAC-Announce] FW: ICANN News Alert -- Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process To: "alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org" < alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
[http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/> News Alert
http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-05feb13- en.ht m
________________________________ Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process
5 February 2013
Forum Announcement: Comment Period Opens on Date: 5 February 2013 Categories/Tags:
* Top-Level Domains * Policy Processes
Purpose (Brief): In the framework of the ccNSO Policy Development Process on IDN ccTLD's the purpose of the Interim Report< http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/idn-ccpdp-interim-04feb13-en.pdf
[PDF, 556 KB] is to report on and seek feed-back on feasible recommendations for overall policy for the selection of IDN country code Top Level Domains strings (IDN ccTLD's) and the inclusion of IDN ccTLD managers in the ccNSO. The Interim Report builds on the Final Paper's of IDN ccPDP Working Groups 1 and 2, which have been open for public comment. Public Comment Box Link: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/idn-ccpdp-05feb13- en.htm
This message was sent to matt.ashtiani@icann.org<mailto: matt.ashtiani@icann.org> from:
ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
Email Marketing by [http://app.icontact.com/images/icontact_tryFree.gif] < http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186>
Manage Your Subscription <
http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail- mprofile.pl?r=24564788&l=6333&s=BCA 3&m=904926&c=165637
_______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce
At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ IDN-WG mailing list IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
IDN WG Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+IDN+Policy
_______________________________________________ IDN-WG mailing list IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
IDN WG Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At- Large+IDN+Policy ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.2897 / Virus Database: 2639/6085 - Release Date: 02/06/13
_______________________________________________ IDN-WG mailing list IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
IDN WG Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+IDN+Policy
-- Professor Dr. Hong Xue Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL) Beijing Normal University http://www.iipl.org.cn/ 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street Beijing 100875 China
* *- I'd like to make sure that the system remains open and fair, for instance between states sharing the same language(s), e.g. Arabic or Chinese. The issue is not unlike the one in the IDN Variants debate, where there was a tendency for certain states to claim (and act as if) a language or a script was theirs alone, forcing others to accept their national norms. It's quite possible that this problem may not arise, or that it has been settled. Do you share my concern?* *
This is very interesting prospective. Given that the PDP is about IDN ccTLDs, the TLD strings should all be pertinent "country or territority names". It would be rare that one ccTLD want to interfere another ccTLD's IDN string in the same character set. At least, there is no problem in Chinese or CJK group, e.g. “日本” fortunately is the same in both Chinese and Japanese and "新加坡" is the same in both China and Singapore. I'm not so sure about Arabic usage of country names. Hong
2013/2/6 Rinalia Abdul Rahim <rinalia.abdulrahim@gmail.com>
Dear IDN Working Group,
A public comment period is now open on IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process (Interim Report). Please indicate if you think there should be an ALAC response to this document.
Regarding the Final Report on User Experience related to the activation of IDN variant TLDs, if after the webinar scheduled on 13 February you feel that there should be a response on this issue, please flag it immediately.
Best regards,
Rinalia Abdul Rahim
sent via galaxy tab ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "ICANN At-Large Staff" <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Date: 6 Feb 2013 07:20 Subject: [ALAC-Announce] FW: ICANN News Alert -- Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process To: "alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org" < alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
[http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/> News Alert
http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-05feb13-en.htm
________________________________ Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process
5 February 2013
Forum Announcement: Comment Period Opens on Date: 5 February 2013 Categories/Tags:
* Top-Level Domains * Policy Processes
Purpose (Brief): In the framework of the ccNSO Policy Development Process on IDN ccTLD's the purpose of the Interim Report< http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/idn-ccpdp-interim-04feb13-en.pdf> [PDF, 556 KB] is to report on and seek feed-back on feasible recommendations for overall policy for the selection of IDN country code Top Level Domains strings (IDN ccTLD's) and the inclusion of IDN ccTLD managers in the ccNSO. The Interim Report builds on the Final Paper's of IDN ccPDP Working Groups 1 and 2, which have been open for public comment. Public Comment Box Link: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/idn-ccpdp-05feb13-en.htm
This message was sent to matt.ashtiani@icann.org<mailto: matt.ashtiani@icann.org> from:
ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
Email Marketing by [http://app.icontact.com/images/icontact_tryFree.gif] < http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186>
Manage Your Subscription <
http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=24564788&l=6333&s=BCA3&m=904...
_______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce
At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ IDN-WG mailing list IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
IDN WG Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+IDN+Policy
_______________________________________________ IDN-WG mailing list IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
IDN WG Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+IDN+Policy
-- Professor Dr. Hong Xue Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL) Beijing Normal University http://www.iipl.org.cn/ 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street Beijing 100875 China
*Dear Hong,* * * *thank you for your reaction. Not having followed every step of the debate, I do have a question : will the following variants have equal standing, and be accepted in China, Singapore and Taiwan,* *中國 ／ 中国* *台灣 ／ 台湾* * * *Like you, I'm not capable of distinguishing variants in Arabic.* * * *Best regards,* *Jean-Jacques.* 2013/2/7 Hong Xue <hongxueipr@gmail.com>
* *- I'd like to make sure that the system remains open and fair, for instance between states sharing the same language(s), e.g. Arabic or Chinese. The issue is not unlike the one in the IDN Variants debate, where there was a tendency for certain states to claim (and act as if) a language or a script was theirs alone, forcing others to accept their national norms. It's quite possible that this problem may not arise, or that it has been settled. Do you share my concern?* *
This is very interesting prospective. Given that the PDP is about IDN ccTLDs, the TLD strings should all be pertinent "country or territority names". It would be rare that one ccTLD want to interfere another ccTLD's IDN string in the same character set. At least, there is no problem in Chinese or CJK group, e.g. “日本” fortunately is the same in both Chinese and Japanese and "新加坡" is the same in both China and Singapore. I'm not so sure about Arabic usage of country names.
Hong
2013/2/6 Rinalia Abdul Rahim <rinalia.abdulrahim@gmail.com>
Dear IDN Working Group,
A public comment period is now open on IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process (Interim Report). Please indicate if you think there should be an ALAC response to this document.
Regarding the Final Report on User Experience related to the activation of IDN variant TLDs, if after the webinar scheduled on 13 February you feel that there should be a response on this issue, please flag it immediately.
Best regards,
Rinalia Abdul Rahim
sent via galaxy tab ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "ICANN At-Large Staff" <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Date: 6 Feb 2013 07:20 Subject: [ALAC-Announce] FW: ICANN News Alert -- Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process To: "alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org" < alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
[http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/> News Alert
http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-05feb13-en.htm
________________________________ Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process
5 February 2013
Forum Announcement: Comment Period Opens on Date: 5 February 2013 Categories/Tags:
* Top-Level Domains * Policy Processes
Purpose (Brief): In the framework of the ccNSO Policy Development Process on IDN ccTLD's the purpose of the Interim Report< http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/idn-ccpdp-interim-04feb13-en.pdf> [PDF, 556 KB] is to report on and seek feed-back on feasible recommendations for overall policy for the selection of IDN country code Top Level Domains strings (IDN ccTLD's) and the inclusion of IDN ccTLD managers in the ccNSO. The Interim Report builds on the Final Paper's of IDN ccPDP Working Groups 1 and 2, which have been open for public comment. Public Comment Box Link: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/idn-ccpdp-05feb13-en.htm
This message was sent to matt.ashtiani@icann.org<mailto: matt.ashtiani@icann.org> from:
ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
Email Marketing by [http://app.icontact.com/images/icontact_tryFree.gif] < http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186>
Manage Your Subscription <
http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=24564788&l=6333&s=BCA3&m=904...
_______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce
At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ IDN-WG mailing list IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
IDN WG Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+IDN+Policy
_______________________________________________ IDN-WG mailing list IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
IDN WG Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+IDN+Policy
-- Professor Dr. Hong Xue Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL) Beijing Normal University http://www.iipl.org.cn/ 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street Beijing 100875 China
thank you for your reaction. Not having followed every step of the debate, I do have a question : will the following variants have equal standing, and be accepted in China, Singapore and Taiwan, 中國 ／ 中国 台灣 ／ 台湾
Yes, Chinese community through CDNC has adopted the uniform variant table. It is pretty sure that the above pairs of strings are deemed the same in the community. Hong .
2013/2/7 Hong Xue <hongxueipr@gmail.com>
* *- I'd like to make sure that the system remains open and fair, for instance between states sharing the same language(s), e.g. Arabic or Chinese. The issue is not unlike the one in the IDN Variants debate, where there was a tendency for certain states to claim (and act as if) a language or a script was theirs alone, forcing others to accept their national norms. It's quite possible that this problem may not arise, or that it has been settled. Do you share my concern?* *
This is very interesting prospective. Given that the PDP is about IDN ccTLDs, the TLD strings should all be pertinent "country or territority names". It would be rare that one ccTLD want to interfere another ccTLD's IDN string in the same character set. At least, there is no problem in Chinese or CJK group, e.g. “日本” fortunately is the same in both Chinese and Japanese and "新加坡" is the same in both China and Singapore. I'm not so sure about Arabic usage of country names.
Hong
2013/2/6 Rinalia Abdul Rahim <rinalia.abdulrahim@gmail.com>
Dear IDN Working Group,
A public comment period is now open on IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process (Interim Report). Please indicate if you think there should be an ALAC response to this document.
Regarding the Final Report on User Experience related to the activation of IDN variant TLDs, if after the webinar scheduled on 13 February you feel that there should be a response on this issue, please flag it immediately.
Best regards,
Rinalia Abdul Rahim
sent via galaxy tab ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "ICANN At-Large Staff" <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Date: 6 Feb 2013 07:20 Subject: [ALAC-Announce] FW: ICANN News Alert -- Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process To: "alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org" < alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
[http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/> News Alert
http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-05feb13-en.htm
________________________________ Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process
5 February 2013
Forum Announcement: Comment Period Opens on Date: 5 February 2013 Categories/Tags:
* Top-Level Domains * Policy Processes
Purpose (Brief): In the framework of the ccNSO Policy Development Process on IDN ccTLD's the purpose of the Interim Report< http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/idn-ccpdp-interim-04feb13-en.pdf> [PDF, 556 KB] is to report on and seek feed-back on feasible recommendations for overall policy for the selection of IDN country code Top Level Domains strings (IDN ccTLD's) and the inclusion of IDN ccTLD managers in the ccNSO. The Interim Report builds on the Final Paper's of IDN ccPDP Working Groups 1 and 2, which have been open for public comment. Public Comment Box Link: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/idn-ccpdp-05feb13-en.htm
This message was sent to matt.ashtiani@icann.org<mailto: matt.ashtiani@icann.org> from:
ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
Email Marketing by [http://app.icontact.com/images/icontact_tryFree.gif] < http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186>
Manage Your Subscription <
http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=24564788&l=6333&s=BCA3&m=904...
_______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce
At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ IDN-WG mailing list IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
IDN WG Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+IDN+Policy
_______________________________________________ IDN-WG mailing list IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
IDN WG Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+IDN+Policy
-- Professor Dr. Hong Xue Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL) Beijing Normal University http://www.iipl.org.cn/ 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street Beijing 100875 China
-- Professor Dr. Hong Xue Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL) Beijing Normal University http://www.iipl.org.cn/ 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street Beijing 100875 China
*Thank you Hong for the clarification.* *Jean-Jacques. * 2013/2/7 Hong Xue <hongxueipr@gmail.com>
thank you for your reaction. Not having followed every step of the debate, I do have a question : will the following variants have equal standing, and be accepted in China, Singapore and Taiwan, 中國 ／ 中国 台灣 ／ 台湾
Yes, Chinese community through CDNC has adopted the uniform variant table. It is pretty sure that the above pairs of strings are deemed the same in the community.
Hong
.
2013/2/7 Hong Xue <hongxueipr@gmail.com>
* *- I'd like to make sure that the system remains open and fair, for instance between states sharing the same language(s), e.g. Arabic or Chinese. The issue is not unlike the one in the IDN Variants debate, where there was a tendency for certain states to claim (and act as if) a language or a script was theirs alone, forcing others to accept their national norms. It's quite possible that this problem may not arise, or that it has been settled. Do you share my concern?* *
This is very interesting prospective. Given that the PDP is about IDN ccTLDs, the TLD strings should all be pertinent "country or territority names". It would be rare that one ccTLD want to interfere another ccTLD's IDN string in the same character set. At least, there is no problem in Chinese or CJK group, e.g. “日本” fortunately is the same in both Chinese and Japanese and "新加坡" is the same in both China and Singapore. I'm not so sure about Arabic usage of country names.
Hong
2013/2/6 Rinalia Abdul Rahim <rinalia.abdulrahim@gmail.com>
Dear IDN Working Group,
A public comment period is now open on IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process (Interim Report). Please indicate if you think there should be an
ALAC
response to this document.
Regarding the Final Report on User Experience related to the activation of IDN variant TLDs, if after the webinar scheduled on 13 February you feel that there should be a response on this issue, please flag it immediately.
Best regards,
Rinalia Abdul Rahim
sent via galaxy tab ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "ICANN At-Large Staff" <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Date: 6 Feb 2013 07:20 Subject: [ALAC-Announce] FW: ICANN News Alert -- Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process To: "alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org" < alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
[http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/
News Alert
http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-05feb13-en.htm
________________________________ Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process
5 February 2013
Forum Announcement: Comment Period Opens on Date: 5 February
2013
Categories/Tags:
* Top-Level Domains * Policy Processes
Purpose (Brief): In the framework of the ccNSO Policy Development Process on IDN ccTLD's the purpose of the Interim Report<
http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/idn-ccpdp-interim-04feb13-en.pdf>
[PDF, 556 KB] is to report on and seek feed-back on feasible recommendations for overall policy for the selection of IDN country code Top Level Domains strings (IDN ccTLD's) and the inclusion of IDN ccTLD managers in the ccNSO. The Interim Report builds on the Final Paper's of IDN ccPDP Working Groups 1 and 2, which have been open for public comment. Public Comment Box Link: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/idn-ccpdp-05feb13-en.htm
This message was sent to matt.ashtiani@icann.org<mailto: matt.ashtiani@icann.org> from:
ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
Email Marketing by [http://app.icontact.com/images/icontact_tryFree.gif] < http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186>
Manage Your Subscription <
http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=24564788&l=6333&s=BCA3&m=904...
_______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce
At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ IDN-WG mailing list IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
IDN WG Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+IDN+Policy
_______________________________________________ IDN-WG mailing list IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
IDN WG Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+IDN+Policy
-- Professor Dr. Hong Xue Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL) Beijing Normal University http://www.iipl.org.cn/ 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street Beijing 100875 China
-- Professor Dr. Hong Xue Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL) Beijing Normal University http://www.iipl.org.cn/ 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street Beijing 100875 China
participants (4)
-
Edmon -
Hong Xue -
JJS -
Rinalia Abdul Rahim