I've made a slight change to the text for CL1. 

CL1 Analysis: This is a useful observation and the WG agrees that the IDN label the guidelines are currently referring to names being registered under the TLD in question.  We will clarify the scope of the document to indicate that only the owner-name of the DNS records which are added to the zone file by the registration system are in-scope. Excluded from scope are any glue records and right-hand or target names.

Kal Feher

Neustar Inc.
Level 8, 10 Queens Road, Melbourne, Australia VIC 3004

Office +61 3 9866 3710 / kal.feher@team.neustar / www.neustar.biz

Follow Neustar:   http://neunet.neustar.biz/sites/default/files/295/New%20Picture.png Facebook   http://neunet.neustar.biz/sites/default/files/295/New%20Picture%20(1)(1).png LinkedIn   http://neunet.neustar.biz/sites/default/files/295/New%20Picture%20(2).png Twitter

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.



From: <idngwg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Mats Dufberg <mats.dufberg@iis.se>
Date: Thursday, 7 September 2017 at 23:38
To: "idngwg@icann.org" <idngwg@icann.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Idngwg] Proposed new CL1 and CL2 Analysis

Current:

 

CL1 Analysis: This is a useful observation and the WG agrees that the IDN label the guidelines are currently referring to are those which are authoritative in the zone.  We will clarify this is meant by default and call out any specific reference to non-authoritative data in the guidelines explicitly to ensure there is no ambiguity.

 

Proposed:

 

CL1 Analysis: This is a useful observation and the WG agrees that the IDN label the guidelines are currently referring to names being registered under the TLD in question.  We will clarify that this the scope of the document, and that DNS records as such are only in-scope when there is direct connection to the registered name.

 

Current:

 

CL2 Analysis: The WG is currently considering if the guidelines should cover data which is not authoritative for the relevant zone.  If the WG considers it relevant after discussions, appropriate text will be added, either as part of the discussion on scope or else as a guideline specific for such data.

 

Proposed:

 

CL2 Analysis: The WG has come to the conclusion that that is out of scope of the Guidelines.

 

 

 

 

---

Mats Dufberg

DNS Specialist, IIS

Mobile: +46 73 065 3899

https://www.iis.se/en/