Dear All,

Here is an updated version for further discussion today.  I have added a response to RYSG6 based on the discussion.  This was skipped in the previous version.  Sorry for the oversight. 

Regards,
Sarmad

From: Idngwg [mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sarmad Hussain
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 6:21 PM
To: idngwg@icann.org
Subject: [Idngwg] Notes from IDNGWG meeting on 20180222

Dear IDN Guidelines WG members,

Please find attached the notes from the meeting on 22 February 2018.  Please let us know if you have any feedback.  Please also review the Action Items below.

Please also find attached an complete draft of the responses to the public comments.  Kindly review and provide any feedback on this draft for its finalization.

Action Items

S. No.	Action Items	Owner
1	Update response to RYSG4 to include the value of X=18 months and include the explanatory text for requiring the LGR format from the response in the first public comment	SH
2	Check if the six-month delay in implementation is applicable to changes in IDN Guidelines for contracted parties	SH
3	Check with RySG if it has a call before ICANN 61 and if an agenda item on the RYSG4 comment can be included in that call	DT
4	Check how IDNGWG can pass on the NCSG1 comment regarding Section 1.2 to ICANN org	SH
5	Complete the Public Comment response document	SH
6	Develop a draft of presentation for ICANN61 – focusing on public comments and their responses	SH

The recording of the call and its summary will soon be available at the IDN Guidelines wiki page at https://community.icann.org/display/IDN/IDN+Implementation+Guidelines.

Regards,
Sarmad