Re: [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline
Sarmad, The traceability matrix looks fine to me. A couple of observations from my review: 1. We didn’t review appendices A and B from v3. I think we should spend some time discussing whether a revised version or removal is warranted, or nothing at all. Of course, if we do include additional information into the draft this would mean another public comment period. 2. In recommendation 13 we refer to a lot of documents and we probably want to be very specific as to which sections of those documents are relevant to the guidelines. I believe we need to be very specific in references since this document is binding for gTLDS. I’m ok with resuming the calls next week at 10:00 am UTC but if you want to do a doddle poll, that’s fine with me as well. Thanks, Dennis From: <idngwg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 1:55 AM To: "idngwg@icann.org" <idngwg@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Dear All, I wanted to follow up with all of you on this thread. Kindly review the attached document and let me know if you have any feedback. We should finalize it to allow to respond to the query below. I would suggest that we post the final version of this document on our wiki page so that we can point others to the same document. Please also advise when you would like to continue our fortnightly meetings (now? After public comments?). Should we use the same time (in UTC) or change is following the daylight savings time changes in some countries. Regards Sarmad From: idngwg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sarmad Hussain Sent: Wednesday, 8 March, 2017 5:46 PM To: idngwg@icann.org Subject: [Idngwg] FW: [Ext] Re: FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Thanks Dennis. All, Please find attached a first cut for a traceability matrix. Please feel free to suggest if we want a different approach or if there are any suggestions on the content. Should we include it as an appendix to the next draft we produce or share separately? Also, please review the contents and let me know if you agree with the analysis or have any suggested changes. Regards, Sarmad From: Tan Tanaka, Dennis [mailto:dtantanaka@verisign.com] Sent: Tuesday, 7 March, 2017 7:47 PM To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org<mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org>>; idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline My preference is option #2. -Dennis From: <idngwg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org<mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org>> Date: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 12:32 AM To: "idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org>" <idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Dear IDNGWG members Kindly see the enquiry below. We have not created a redline comparison with previous version, as there are significant new additions in the revised version. There are at least three options: 1. We create a redline version and release it 2. Create a traceability matrix with summary of which guidelines were retained, changed, dropped or added in the next version 3. State that the version is significantly different and thus such an analysis is not been performed (not preferred) I will proceed as you suggest, and respond to Yasmin accordingly. Regards, Sarmad From: Omer, Yasmin Sent: Tuesday, 7 March, 2017 4:22 AM To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org<mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org>> Subject: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Hi Sarmad, Is there a redline of the new IDN Implementation Guidelines against the previous version? Thanks, Yasmin
Thanks Dennis. All, Any further feedback on the traceability matrix? Is it ok to publish on IDNGWG wiki page? A feedback soon would be appreciated. Our regular time has been 11am UTC. Should we switch to an hour earlier or a doodle poll, as suggested by Dennis? to address the items suggested by Dennis and other matters. Regards, Sarmad From: Tan Tanaka, Dennis [mailto:dtantanaka@verisign.com] Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:11 AM To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org>; idngwg@icann.org Subject: [Ext] Re: [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Sarmad, The traceability matrix looks fine to me. A couple of observations from my review: 1. We didn’t review appendices A and B from v3. I think we should spend some time discussing whether a revised version or removal is warranted, or nothing at all. Of course, if we do include additional information into the draft this would mean another public comment period. 2. In recommendation 13 we refer to a lot of documents and we probably want to be very specific as to which sections of those documents are relevant to the guidelines. I believe we need to be very specific in references since this document is binding for gTLDS. I’m ok with resuming the calls next week at 10:00 am UTC but if you want to do a doddle poll, that’s fine with me as well. Thanks, Dennis From: <idngwg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org<mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org>> Date: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 1:55 AM To: "idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org>" <idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Dear All, I wanted to follow up with all of you on this thread. Kindly review the attached document and let me know if you have any feedback. We should finalize it to allow to respond to the query below. I would suggest that we post the final version of this document on our wiki page so that we can point others to the same document. Please also advise when you would like to continue our fortnightly meetings (now? After public comments?). Should we use the same time (in UTC) or change is following the daylight savings time changes in some countries. Regards Sarmad From: idngwg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sarmad Hussain Sent: Wednesday, 8 March, 2017 5:46 PM To: idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org> Subject: [Idngwg] FW: [Ext] Re: FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Thanks Dennis. All, Please find attached a first cut for a traceability matrix. Please feel free to suggest if we want a different approach or if there are any suggestions on the content. Should we include it as an appendix to the next draft we produce or share separately? Also, please review the contents and let me know if you agree with the analysis or have any suggested changes. Regards, Sarmad From: Tan Tanaka, Dennis [mailto:dtantanaka@verisign.com] Sent: Tuesday, 7 March, 2017 7:47 PM To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org<mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org>>; idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline My preference is option #2. -Dennis From: <idngwg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org<mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org>> Date: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 12:32 AM To: "idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org>" <idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Dear IDNGWG members Kindly see the enquiry below. We have not created a redline comparison with previous version, as there are significant new additions in the revised version. There are at least three options: 1. We create a redline version and release it 2. Create a traceability matrix with summary of which guidelines were retained, changed, dropped or added in the next version 3. State that the version is significantly different and thus such an analysis is not been performed (not preferred) I will proceed as you suggest, and respond to Yasmin accordingly. Regards, Sarmad From: Omer, Yasmin Sent: Tuesday, 7 March, 2017 4:22 AM To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org<mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org>> Subject: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Hi Sarmad, Is there a redline of the new IDN Implementation Guidelines against the previous version? Thanks, Yasmin
I think the traceability matrix is fine. Let's publish it. Happy to move to an hour earlier. But think we can wait till the public comment is over before resuming calls? When we put out the draft final report, there needs to be a public comment period anyway, so i think its ok to make the changes then rather than insert them further now. Edmon From: idngwg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sarmad Hussain Sent: Thursday, 23 March 2017 15:45 PM To: Tan Tanaka, Dennis <dtantanaka@verisign.com>; idngwg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Idngwg] [Ext] Re: FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Thanks Dennis. All, Any further feedback on the traceability matrix? Is it ok to publish on IDNGWG wiki page? A feedback soon would be appreciated. Our regular time has been 11am UTC. Should we switch to an hour earlier or a doodle poll, as suggested by Dennis? to address the items suggested by Dennis and other matters. Regards, Sarmad From: Tan Tanaka, Dennis [mailto:dtantanaka@verisign.com] Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:11 AM To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org <mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org> >; idngwg@icann.org <mailto:idngwg@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Sarmad, The traceability matrix looks fine to me. A couple of observations from my review: 1. We didn’t review appendices A and B from v3. I think we should spend some time discussing whether a revised version or removal is warranted, or nothing at all. Of course, if we do include additional information into the draft this would mean another public comment period. 2. In recommendation 13 we refer to a lot of documents and we probably want to be very specific as to which sections of those documents are relevant to the guidelines. I believe we need to be very specific in references since this document is binding for gTLDS. I’m ok with resuming the calls next week at 10:00 am UTC but if you want to do a doddle poll, that’s fine with me as well. Thanks, Dennis From: <idngwg-bounces@icann.org <mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org> > on behalf of Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org <mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org> > Date: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 1:55 AM To: "idngwg@icann.org <mailto:idngwg@icann.org> " <idngwg@icann.org <mailto:idngwg@icann.org> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Dear All, I wanted to follow up with all of you on this thread. Kindly review the attached document and let me know if you have any feedback. We should finalize it to allow to respond to the query below. I would suggest that we post the final version of this document on our wiki page so that we can point others to the same document. Please also advise when you would like to continue our fortnightly meetings (now? After public comments?). Should we use the same time (in UTC) or change is following the daylight savings time changes in some countries. Regards Sarmad From: idngwg-bounces@icann.org <mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sarmad Hussain Sent: Wednesday, 8 March, 2017 5:46 PM To: idngwg@icann.org <mailto:idngwg@icann.org> Subject: [Idngwg] FW: [Ext] Re: FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Thanks Dennis. All, Please find attached a first cut for a traceability matrix. Please feel free to suggest if we want a different approach or if there are any suggestions on the content. Should we include it as an appendix to the next draft we produce or share separately? Also, please review the contents and let me know if you agree with the analysis or have any suggested changes. Regards, Sarmad From: Tan Tanaka, Dennis [mailto:dtantanaka@verisign.com] Sent: Tuesday, 7 March, 2017 7:47 PM To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org <mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org> >; idngwg@icann.org <mailto:idngwg@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline My preference is option #2. -Dennis From: <idngwg-bounces@icann.org <mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org> > on behalf of Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org <mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org> > Date: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 12:32 AM To: "idngwg@icann.org <mailto:idngwg@icann.org> " <idngwg@icann.org <mailto:idngwg@icann.org> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Dear IDNGWG members Kindly see the enquiry below. We have not created a redline comparison with previous version, as there are significant new additions in the revised version. There are at least three options: 1. We create a redline version and release it 2. Create a traceability matrix with summary of which guidelines were retained, changed, dropped or added in the next version 3. State that the version is significantly different and thus such an analysis is not been performed (not preferred) I will proceed as you suggest, and respond to Yasmin accordingly. Regards, Sarmad From: Omer, Yasmin Sent: Tuesday, 7 March, 2017 4:22 AM To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org <mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org> > Subject: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Hi Sarmad, Is there a redline of the new IDN Implementation Guidelines against the previous version? Thanks, Yasmin
Thanks Edmon. I will publish the matrix tomorrow, unless we get any further comments. Also, we will resume the calls after public comments as you suggest. I will check with all the members on the time the week before we resume our meeting. The Public Comments will be closing on 17 April. Thus we will plan for a meeting tentatively on 20 April. Regards, Sarmad From: Edmon Chung [mailto:edmon@registry.asia] Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:57 PM To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org>; 'Tan Tanaka, Dennis' <dtantanaka@verisign.com>; idngwg@icann.org Subject: RE: [Idngwg] [Ext] Re: FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline I think the traceability matrix is fine. Let's publish it. Happy to move to an hour earlier. But think we can wait till the public comment is over before resuming calls? When we put out the draft final report, there needs to be a public comment period anyway, so i think its ok to make the changes then rather than insert them further now. Edmon From: idngwg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sarmad Hussain Sent: Thursday, 23 March 2017 15:45 PM To: Tan Tanaka, Dennis <dtantanaka@verisign.com<mailto:dtantanaka@verisign.com>>; idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Idngwg] [Ext] Re: FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Thanks Dennis. All, Any further feedback on the traceability matrix? Is it ok to publish on IDNGWG wiki page? A feedback soon would be appreciated. Our regular time has been 11am UTC. Should we switch to an hour earlier or a doodle poll, as suggested by Dennis? to address the items suggested by Dennis and other matters. Regards, Sarmad From: Tan Tanaka, Dennis [mailto:dtantanaka@verisign.com] Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:11 AM To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org<mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org>>; idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Sarmad, The traceability matrix looks fine to me. A couple of observations from my review: 1. We didn’t review appendices A and B from v3. I think we should spend some time discussing whether a revised version or removal is warranted, or nothing at all. Of course, if we do include additional information into the draft this would mean another public comment period. 2. In recommendation 13 we refer to a lot of documents and we probably want to be very specific as to which sections of those documents are relevant to the guidelines. I believe we need to be very specific in references since this document is binding for gTLDS. I’m ok with resuming the calls next week at 10:00 am UTC but if you want to do a doddle poll, that’s fine with me as well. Thanks, Dennis From: <idngwg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org<mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org>> Date: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 1:55 AM To: "idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org>" <idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Dear All, I wanted to follow up with all of you on this thread. Kindly review the attached document and let me know if you have any feedback. We should finalize it to allow to respond to the query below. I would suggest that we post the final version of this document on our wiki page so that we can point others to the same document. Please also advise when you would like to continue our fortnightly meetings (now? After public comments?). Should we use the same time (in UTC) or change is following the daylight savings time changes in some countries. Regards Sarmad From: idngwg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sarmad Hussain Sent: Wednesday, 8 March, 2017 5:46 PM To: idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org> Subject: [Idngwg] FW: [Ext] Re: FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Thanks Dennis. All, Please find attached a first cut for a traceability matrix. Please feel free to suggest if we want a different approach or if there are any suggestions on the content. Should we include it as an appendix to the next draft we produce or share separately? Also, please review the contents and let me know if you agree with the analysis or have any suggested changes. Regards, Sarmad From: Tan Tanaka, Dennis [mailto:dtantanaka@verisign.com] Sent: Tuesday, 7 March, 2017 7:47 PM To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org<mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org>>; idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline My preference is option #2. -Dennis From: <idngwg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org<mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org>> Date: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 12:32 AM To: "idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org>" <idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Dear IDNGWG members Kindly see the enquiry below. We have not created a redline comparison with previous version, as there are significant new additions in the revised version. There are at least three options: 1. We create a redline version and release it 2. Create a traceability matrix with summary of which guidelines were retained, changed, dropped or added in the next version 3. State that the version is significantly different and thus such an analysis is not been performed (not preferred) I will proceed as you suggest, and respond to Yasmin accordingly. Regards, Sarmad From: Omer, Yasmin Sent: Tuesday, 7 March, 2017 4:22 AM To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org<mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org>> Subject: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Hi Sarmad, Is there a redline of the new IDN Implementation Guidelines against the previous version? Thanks, Yasmin
Dear All, FYI: the traceability matrix is now published at IDNGWG Wiki Page<https://community.icann.org/display/IDN/IDN+Implementation+Guidelines> – direct link: https://community.icann.org/display/IDN/IDN+Implementation+Guidelines?previe.... Regards, Sarmad From: idngwg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sarmad Hussain Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 7:55 PM To: Edmon Chung <edmon@registry.asia>; 'Tan Tanaka, Dennis' <dtantanaka@verisign.com>; idngwg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Idngwg] [Ext] Re: FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Thanks Edmon. I will publish the matrix tomorrow, unless we get any further comments. Also, we will resume the calls after public comments as you suggest. I will check with all the members on the time the week before we resume our meeting. The Public Comments will be closing on 17 April. Thus we will plan for a meeting tentatively on 20 April. Regards, Sarmad From: Edmon Chung [mailto:edmon@registry.asia] Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:57 PM To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org<mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org>>; 'Tan Tanaka, Dennis' <dtantanaka@verisign.com<mailto:dtantanaka@verisign.com>>; idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org> Subject: RE: [Idngwg] [Ext] Re: FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline I think the traceability matrix is fine. Let's publish it. Happy to move to an hour earlier. But think we can wait till the public comment is over before resuming calls? When we put out the draft final report, there needs to be a public comment period anyway, so i think its ok to make the changes then rather than insert them further now. Edmon From: idngwg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sarmad Hussain Sent: Thursday, 23 March 2017 15:45 PM To: Tan Tanaka, Dennis <dtantanaka@verisign.com<mailto:dtantanaka@verisign.com>>; idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Idngwg] [Ext] Re: FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Thanks Dennis. All, Any further feedback on the traceability matrix? Is it ok to publish on IDNGWG wiki page? A feedback soon would be appreciated. Our regular time has been 11am UTC. Should we switch to an hour earlier or a doodle poll, as suggested by Dennis? to address the items suggested by Dennis and other matters. Regards, Sarmad From: Tan Tanaka, Dennis [mailto:dtantanaka@verisign.com] Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:11 AM To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org<mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org>>; idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Sarmad, The traceability matrix looks fine to me. A couple of observations from my review: 1. We didn’t review appendices A and B from v3. I think we should spend some time discussing whether a revised version or removal is warranted, or nothing at all. Of course, if we do include additional information into the draft this would mean another public comment period. 2. In recommendation 13 we refer to a lot of documents and we probably want to be very specific as to which sections of those documents are relevant to the guidelines. I believe we need to be very specific in references since this document is binding for gTLDS. I’m ok with resuming the calls next week at 10:00 am UTC but if you want to do a doddle poll, that’s fine with me as well. Thanks, Dennis From: <idngwg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org<mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org>> Date: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 1:55 AM To: "idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org>" <idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Dear All, I wanted to follow up with all of you on this thread. Kindly review the attached document and let me know if you have any feedback. We should finalize it to allow to respond to the query below. I would suggest that we post the final version of this document on our wiki page so that we can point others to the same document. Please also advise when you would like to continue our fortnightly meetings (now? After public comments?). Should we use the same time (in UTC) or change is following the daylight savings time changes in some countries. Regards Sarmad From: idngwg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sarmad Hussain Sent: Wednesday, 8 March, 2017 5:46 PM To: idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org> Subject: [Idngwg] FW: [Ext] Re: FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Thanks Dennis. All, Please find attached a first cut for a traceability matrix. Please feel free to suggest if we want a different approach or if there are any suggestions on the content. Should we include it as an appendix to the next draft we produce or share separately? Also, please review the contents and let me know if you agree with the analysis or have any suggested changes. Regards, Sarmad From: Tan Tanaka, Dennis [mailto:dtantanaka@verisign.com] Sent: Tuesday, 7 March, 2017 7:47 PM To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org<mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org>>; idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline My preference is option #2. -Dennis From: <idngwg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org<mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org>> Date: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 12:32 AM To: "idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org>" <idngwg@icann.org<mailto:idngwg@icann.org>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Dear IDNGWG members Kindly see the enquiry below. We have not created a redline comparison with previous version, as there are significant new additions in the revised version. There are at least three options: 1. We create a redline version and release it 2. Create a traceability matrix with summary of which guidelines were retained, changed, dropped or added in the next version 3. State that the version is significantly different and thus such an analysis is not been performed (not preferred) I will proceed as you suggest, and respond to Yasmin accordingly. Regards, Sarmad From: Omer, Yasmin Sent: Tuesday, 7 March, 2017 4:22 AM To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org<mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org>> Subject: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline Hi Sarmad, Is there a redline of the new IDN Implementation Guidelines against the previous version? Thanks, Yasmin
participants (3)
-
Edmon Chung -
Sarmad Hussain -
Tan Tanaka, Dennis