Dear IRT,

As promised on our call, find below links to the documents discussed on call:

Staff Rationale for Current Redline Approach: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CDkX-FNmNMncwVS6VBoKL2aDnKSmOrQ-SlTKVzptrZg/edit?tab=t.0

Current redlines:

UDRP: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OCUXfE4gn7-rPJDLLOz_FopVZfRwZl8zmct7VMghw8o/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.i8soj2yx4de

UDRP RULES: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xIsvV0VhWTOQtxu2aEQmQCUYuA5GrTtwemROWizJaqo/edit?tab=t.0

URS: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1azc-wp3mBXF404vZsEfr1l6mYyWGo3udlkWjqkgDEZQ/edit?tab=t.0

URS RULES: https://docs.google.com/document/d/128O8E2EpVg3Rqfe3qtmG1XEITLuoe5Z2Sndw74iO7YM/edit?tab=t.0

Thank you for a productive call. As requested on call, if possible can you please send a brief rationale on list explaining how the arbitration pre-determination (UDRP/URSP) could be implemented in line with current policy language, and/or the additions required to do so that would not involve re-opening the Final Report. This would be very helpful in understanding the IRTs collective position on this issue.

Best wishes,

Peter

Peter Eakin

Policy Research Specialist, Policy Research & Stakeholder Programs

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Tel: + 32 493 547 913

Office: 6 Rond Point Schuman, Bt. 1, Brussels B-1040, Belgium