Hi Chris, The first linked document (staff rationale) sets out the reasoning behind this interpretation of the Final Report. Best, Peter Sent from my iPhone On 3 Dec 2025, at 16:30, Chris Disspain <chris.disspain@identity.digital> wrote:  Hi Peter, Thanks for this. As requested on call, if possible can you please send a brief rationale on list explaining how the arbitration pre-determination (UDRP/URSP) could be implemented in line with current policy language, and/or the additions required to do so that would not involve re-opening the Final Report. If I understand your position, you believe that it should not be possible to go to arbitration unless and until a UDRP decision has been made. Assuming I am correct It would help me enormously if you could call out the specific part of the docs listed below containing your rationale for that. Cheers, CD Chris Disspain +44 7880 642456 <AIorK4xWevLg7DM8FNJKXERnsV06zXuazaQVoJFTyAE5wjxp9tzIfz3Z3HM-Zvrkyy72U8Iwybs6ZGY.jpeg> On 3 Dec 2025, at 15:18, Peter Eakin via Igo-ingo-curative-rights-irt <igo-ingo-curative-rights-irt@icann.org> wrote: Dear IRT, As promised on our call, find below links to the documents discussed on call: Staff Rationale for Current Redline Approach: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CDkX-FNmNMncwVS6VBoKL2aDnKSmOrQ-SlTKVzpt... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CDkX-FNmNMnc...> Current redlines: UDRP: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OCUXfE4gn7-rPJDLLOz_FopVZfRwZl8zmct7VMgh... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OCUXfE4gn7-r...> UDRP RULES: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xIsvV0VhWTOQtxu2aEQmQCUYuA5GrTtwemROWizJ... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xIsvV0VhWTOQ...> URS: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1azc-wp3mBXF404vZsEfr1l6mYyWGo3udlkWjqkgD... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://docs.google.com/document/d/1azc-wp3mBXF4...> URS RULES: https://docs.google.com/document/d/128O8E2EpVg3Rqfe3qtmG1XEITLuoe5Z2Sndw74iO... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://docs.google.com/document/d/128O8E2EpVg3R...> Thank you for a productive call. As requested on call, if possible can you please send a brief rationale on list explaining how the arbitration pre-determination (UDRP/URSP) could be implemented in line with current policy language, and/or the additions required to do so that would not involve re-opening the Final Report. This would be very helpful in understanding the IRTs collective position on this issue. Best wishes, Peter Peter Eakin Policy Research Specialist, Policy Research & Stakeholder Programs Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Tel: + 32 493 547 913 Office: 6 Rond Point Schuman, Bt. 1, Brussels B-1040, Belgium _______________________________________________ Igo-ingo-curative-rights-irt mailing list -- igo-ingo-curative-rights-irt@icann.org<mailto:igo-ingo-curative-rights-irt@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to igo-ingo-curative-rights-irt-leave@icann.org<mailto:igo-ingo-curative-rights-irt-leave@icann.org>