Below are my inputs 1. The review framework should continue to serve as an important mechanism for strengthening accountability and transparency within ICANN. However, future reviews should place greater emphasis on measurable outcomes and demonstrated impact rather than repeating procedural assessments that already exist within ICANN’s planning and reporting structures. Reviews should clearly show how they contribute to improved organisational performance, enhanced community participation, and increased trust in the multistakeholder model. 2. The Continuous Improvement Program (CIP) should play a central role in the evolving review ecosystem. Independent validation mechanisms should be introduced to confirm that CIP outputs are evidence-based, implemented as intended, and capable of strengthening collaboration across Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees. Greater attention should also be given to tracking implementation and sharing good practices across community structures. 3. Initiation of reviews should reflect a balanced model in which the Board may act in consultation with the community, while meaningful community support thresholds are required to ensure legitimacy and relevance. Ad hoc reviews may remain an important tool for addressing emerging issues, provided clear criteria, defined scope, and resource considerations are established in advance. -- John Gbadamosi Programme Officer, Digital Rights Media Rights Agenda Internet of Rights (IoR) Fellow Article 19, UK +2348099817296 john@mediarightsagenda.org @Samjohn70