Yes fully agree .. Will be reflected in a new version dated Oct 23^rd ..

Kind Regards

--Manal

From: James M. Bladel [mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 4:42 PM
To: Manal Ismail; internal-cg@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until 21Oct14 ..

Manal -

Thanks for including my (rough) text as a third option.  But I am wondering if it belongs in Q15, or perhaps as an add-on to Q16?

Let me know where you think it fits..

Thanks—

J.

From: Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg>
Date: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 at 4:37
To: ICG List <internal-cg@icann.org>
Subject: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until 21Oct14 ..

Dear All ..

Please find attached, and in Dropbox, an updated version of the ICG FAQ reflecting comments received at the f2f meeting and over email until 21 October 2014 ..

Kindly note that I haven’t crossed checked with the meeting transcripts yet but hope the attached accurately reflects all our discussions ..

Also please note that we now have 3 alternative sentences as part of answer to Q#15 on ICG and the ICANN Board ..

Jean-Jacques, you mentioned that you are ok with Milton’s latest suggestion, please let me know if this means that I should delete your suggested wording ..

If you wish, please feel free to edit the file directly using track changes and adding your initials to the file name ..

Kind Regards

--Manal