FWIW, my view is that we should first wait for the open comment period to close, and absorb the comments, if any, on the pieces of the suggested process that is relevant to us.

   Patrik

On 16 sep 2014, at 17:01, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:

Hi Wolf-Ulrich,

Is there some uncertainty about the existence and role definition of that
liaison still somewhat uncertain until the accountability process itself
is finalized after the current comment period completes? I’m thinking that
perhaps we could start our discussion about this on the mailing list and
aim to complete it during or shortly after our next call (Oct 1).

Alissa

On 9/16/14, 1:44 PM, "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de> wrote:

Thanks Alissa,

the ICG liaison to the ICANN Accountability & Governance Cross Community
Group should be selected before ICANN51. I wonder whether we could find
some 
time to discuss the process timeline (nominations etc.).

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
From: Alissa Cooper
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 8:23 PM
To: ICG
Subject: [Internal-cg] Proposed agenda for Sept 17 call

Please comment.

1. Minutes approval from Aug 19 and Aug 26 conference calls – 3 minutes
2. Consensus building document – 45 minutes
3. Side meetings at ICANN51 – remaining time

Alissa
_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg