Thank you Patrick,

Below are my comments.

On Jul 24, 2014, at 23:28 PM, Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> wrote:

This email contain my findings and have 6 decisions/action points at the end.
<snip>…
…

Now to the issues, with suggested actions where appropriate:

1. Members and liaisons to ICG

My conclusion on the process is that there is a difference between members of the ICG and Liaisons.
<snip>

Suggestion: When consensus is to be reached, consensus is only among members (not members+liaisons).

Agreed.

2. Support staff

Suggestion: We accept the proposal from ICANN to until further notice from ICG continue with this set of support staff: Theresa, Ergys, Alice, Jim and Hillary.

Agreed.

3. Interim appointed GAC member

Suggestion: The IGC thank Tracy for the ability to participate.

Agreed.

4. Minutes of our meeting

Suggestion: We postpone discussion on minutes and otherwise record taking of our future meetings to the discussion on the Secretariat.

Agreed.

Suggestion: Until minutes from first meeting are complete, Sam Dickingson should be treated as support staff (together with Theresa, Ergys, Alice, Jim and Hillary).

Agreed.

5. ICANN backup contacts

Suggestion: We support ICANN in this proposal, thanks Jamie and Grace for their ability to help, and I validate the situation that they have been removed from the mailing list and that way got special treatment compared with other ICANN staff.

Agreed.

6. Write access to our documents

Alternative C: Members + Support Staff

By letting support staff write to documents members will be relieved from the task of updating documents and otherwise do purely administerial tasks.

Will be my preferred option.

Alternative D: Members + Liaisons + Support Staff

Suggestion: Alternative D, i.e. all Members, Liaisons and Support Staff get read/write access to our documents.

I can live with the above as well.

- a.

_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg