Dear Patrik
Yes I also agree with Manal .In addition we need to examine the relation between the Enhanced ICANN Accountability and activities of ICG as referred to in the Charter
I have made some suggestions .I have made some changes as attached
KAVOUSS


2014-09-01 17:45 GMT+02:00 Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>:
Joseph,

Thanks for the suggestion. Let me think about this. It is important we cluster things the right way so that we also at the same time have time to actually walk through the full agenda. Clusters makes us save time.

   Patrik

On 1 sep 2014, at 14:50, joseph alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com> wrote:

The only question I would have is should we move the consensus process document to be closer to the RFP discussion...
On 9/1/2014 7:15 AM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
All,

Attached is a proposed agenda for the meeting on September 6.

Please come back with feedback on this list.

   Regards, Patrik Fältström




      

_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg


_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg