Dear All,
I am sorry to core back to you,
Version 5  on Mailing is not acceptable to see since there are many problems with that version
Still several points that I sent you  eartlier were not taken into account.
Please kindly look at the last version of my proposal as attached to my last but one e-mail.
Regards
Kavouss


2014-09-03 12:34 GMT+02:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com>:
version 5 still does not cover many iof my points
Pls read the file as attached to my previous mail
Regards
KAVOUSS



2014-09-03 12:31 GMT+02:00 Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>:

v5 is attached. I would send the dropbox link but I’m having dropbox connectivity problems.

On 9/3/14, 1:28 PM, "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Friend
I do not know what is in version 5
Pls look at the attached doc.
KAVOUSS


2014-09-03 12:23 GMT+02:00 Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>:
On 9/3/14, 1:10 PM, "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:

I do not know what we are dealing here

I was commenting on v5 circulated by Wolf-Ulrich. That version has text in it that I find problematic, as indicated in my email. The v4 version you circulated does not contain that language. As I will not be present on Sept 6, I’m trying to get my comments to the mailing list in advance of the meeting.

Alissa

Please kindly read my doc on consensus building sent to you last night
Vrsion 4



2014-09-03 10:28 GMT+02:00 Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>:
Wolf-Ulrich,

Thanks for your work on this.

On 9/2/14, 1:19 AM, "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de> wrote:
>
>* “small minority”: should further be discussed. I added
>  the condition that a recommendation is not reached if at least one of
>the ICG
>  communities (according to the list) as a whole is firmly and formally
>opposed.
>  That would mean a formal written objection by the community leadership
>on
>  behalf of their community.
>

I’m not sure this matches what was being discussed on the list. If we use
the text Martin had suggested, I think the third bullet under section 4(b)
should read:

"After enough time has passed for the ICG to consider and attempt to
accommodate objections, the ICG can reach a conclusion if at most a small
minority disagrees and their objections have been documented.  It is not
expected that the representatives of an operational community
significantly and directly affected by a conclusion would be overruled in
this process.”

Alissa


_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg