Alissa,

Others

If I remeber, in your Note to CWG, it was indicated  that CWG clearly advise ICG by latest 31 January 2015 , the new  deadline that they require to provide reply to RFP .

I do not see any such deadline.

The Co-Chairs of CWG just described the difficulties that they are encountered not being in a position to meet 31 Jan -2015 -

How much more time they need.

Your note was clear.

Before we discuss the matter  in out f2f meeting in Singapore, we need to know how much time they need to reply.

We can not establish another arbitrary deadline as they may not be able to meet the new deadline established by ICG in Singapore either.

Pls clarify the matter.

We should not push more than necessary.

I do not think Radidly done badly done is acceptable.

ICG need to accept the reality.

That reality needs to be duly reflected in the outcome from our Singapore meeting

Kavouss     

2015-01-31 10:30 GMT+01:00 Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net>:

So the cat is finally out of the bag officially :-(.

I suggest that we, the ICG, should take a positive attitude and that we genuinely thank the CWG for their response and their work so far. We need to work actively in order to emphasise the progress already achieved by *all* OCs. We also need to admit that our original time-line was extremely ambitious and possibly unrealistic given the complexities in the "names" OC. We have to do everything to counter the impression that the process has failed or is failing because we are going to miss an extremely ambitious target for delivery of our proposal.

Daniel

_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg