PatreikI am disappointedOnce again what I proposed was disregardedI still believe that they were validPls reconsider that and do not ignor thatRegardsKAVOUSS2014-09-02 6:43 GMT+02:00 Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>:
Wolf-Ulrich,With that agenda item I was thinking of giving the ability for ICG members to report back "what they see is happening" in the community. It was intentionally not specific. I.e. I felt we should have some time on the agenda where it was possible for ICG members to talk about the world outside of ICG.If specific ICG members want to say something, let me know and we will that way see how much time we can allocate per such "reporting back" sub-section.PatrikOn 2 sep 2014, at 01:39, WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de> wrote:I’m fine with your agenda and Manal’s addition. I also agree to keeping an eye to best clustering.Re community updates: do you refer to those “communities” listed in the ICG members list?
Best regards
Wolf-UlrichFrom: Patrik FältströmSent: Monday, September 01, 2014 11:40 PMTo: Kavouss ArastehSubject: Re: [Internal-cg] Proposed agenda for meeting on Sep 6Dear Kavouss,Regarding your proposals. The schedule of events is part of the timeline, and I interpret your suggestion regarding "ICANN Enhanced Accountability Process" being what Manal already proposed.Regarding your request for confirmation for for example the three chair/vice-chair positions not bee needed, as we neither as you say had 100% voting, nor will we have 100% participation at this meeting. We will never have 100% participation in any kind of participation. And that is why I personally am extremely careful of in a context like ICG (or similar to it) talk about a certain percentage be needed to reach a conclusion.If we have consensus, within an announced timeline, then we have reached a conclusion.The rest are implementation details.PatrikOn 1 sep 2014, at 21:07, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear PatrikYes I also agree with Manal .In addition we need to examine the relation between the Enhanced ICANN Accountability and activities of ICG as referred to in the CharterI have made some suggestions .I have made some changes as attachedKAVOUSS<Draft Agenda ICG meeting Istanbul,patrik revised by KA.doc><Draft Agenda ICG meeting Istanbul,patrik revised by KA.doc>
2014-09-01 17:45 GMT+02:00 Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>:
Joseph,Thanks for the suggestion. Let me think about this. It is important we cluster things the right way so that we also at the same time have time to actually walk through the full agenda. Clusters makes us save time.PatrikOn 1 sep 2014, at 14:50, joseph alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com> wrote:
The only question I would have is should we move the consensus process document to be closer to the RFP discussion..._______________________________________________
On 9/1/2014 7:15 AM, Patrik Fältström wrote:All, Attached is a proposed agenda for the meeting on September 6. Please come back with feedback on this list. Regards, Patrik Fältström
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg