Agree ..
That's why I was asking whether the ICG should bring to the attention of
the CWG-Stewardship the way forward regarding the IANA trademark and
domain name, as per the protocol parameters and the numbers proposals ..

Kind Regards
--Manal

-----Original Message-----
From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org
[mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Karrenberg
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 2:28 PM
To: joseph alhadeff; internal-cg@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Step 2 assessment

On 18.02.15 16:23 , joseph alhadeff wrote:
> Agree with the path forward, and would also suggest that we keep the
> Names community apprised of our progress on related work as things
> they may wish to consider in the development of their proposal.

Exactly!

Daniel

_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg