If
Keith withdraws, I would put forward Wolf-Ulrich as a nominee for one of the
vice-chair slots.
He
is from Europe and if we are concerned about representation I think it is
important to have the DNS communities closely involved in the process. Also,
given that the most difficult issues we are likely to face in the transition
will stem from disagreements among the DNS communinties I think it’s important
to have one of the vice-chairs situated there.
--MM
From:
internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On
Behalf Of Drazek, Keith
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 2:26
PM
To: ICG
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Chairing - way
forward
I
also support this way forward.
Similar
to Russ, I support Alissa as Chair. I also have previously stated support for
Patrik Falstrom and would be happy to support Mohammed, who I believe would do a
good job.
If
the ICG agrees to follow the 1+2 construct, I would be prepared to withdraw my
name from consideration (as a US citizen living in the USA) to address the
concerns expressed regarding the optics/perception around geographic
diversity.
Regards,
Keith
From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org
[mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Russ Housley
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 2:07
PM
To: ICG
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Chairing - way
forward
I support this way forward.
I am still willing to serve as a vice-chair, but I also
understand the desire for geographic diversity. Since I strongly
support Alissa as the chair, I withdraw my name from consideration for a
vice-chair since Alissa and I come from the same country.
Russ
On Aug 7, 2014, at 1:57 PM, Alissa Cooper
wrote:
Hi
all,
Thanks to everyone
for engaging on the topic of chair structure. Taking in all of the in-person and
email discussion thus far, I think we have a viable path forward. My
observations are:
1. In response to
the compromise I suggested on July 31 [i], the group demonstrated broad support
for a 1+2 structure, with an objection from Jean-Jacques and ALAC. This included
support from people who had previously stated preferences for other structures,
and even support from people who had previously said they could not live with
1+2. This is what some people might call “consensus” and what I would normally
describe as “rough consensus” in support of 1+2.
2. We have very
strong support for a “1+something” chair structure, following the recent mail
from Jean-Jacques [ii]. I don’t think we have anyone objecting to 1+something at
this point.
3. We have had
lengthy discussions on the list about geographic diversity. We have very strong
support in the group for having geographically diverse participation throughout
the stewardship transition plan development process. We have differences of
opinion within the group about the extent to which that diversity must be
required to extend to the chairs of the ICG.
4. We have a
demonstrated need to agree within the ICG about the methods, both electronic and
in-person, that we will use to arrive at and judge consensus within this group
going forward.
Taking the above
into consideration, let's proceed as follows:
Go forward with a
1+2 structure — 1 chair and 2 vice-chairs. I believe the current list of people
who have volunteered to serve in these roles is:
Russ
Housley
Patrik
Fälström
Mohamed El
Bashir
Keith
Drazek
Alissa
Cooper
(I do not think we
need re-confirmations from the above people because they have mostly
re-confirmed already on the list at some point over the last several weeks, but
if any of the above listed people wants to withdraw, please say
so.)
Taking the
suggestion from Jean-Jacques, I think we should give people a few more days to
volunteer. So if you would like to volunteer, please make that known on the list
by August 11, 23:59 UTC.
On August 12, Joe,
who previously agreed to detail the chair roles and run the selection process
[iii], and Wolf-Ulrich, who has agreed to help Joe while Joe is traveling, will
launch the selection process. In making their selections, ICG participants
should take the geographic diversity discussions we’ve had into
account.
Joe and Wolf-Ulrich
will also begin drafting a proposal that describes the methods the group will
use for arriving at and judging consensus going forward, and will make that
proposal available to the group for discussion when it is
ready.
Thanks,
Alissa
_______________________________________________
Internal-cg
mailing list
Internal-cg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg