Daniel

You misunderstoofd me,

I did not propose to discuss changing the deadline.

I simply proposed to discuss the message7letter received from Jonathan and Byron .

You have noted that I proposed to advise them to make evry effort such as arranging virtual meeting/ conference calls to resolve problems and avoid the need to delay the reply

Please read my message.

Nothuiing wrong to discuss the message sent to Alissa to find out whether other measures ,aparat from increased number of conference calls7 virtual meetings, could be suggested

I hope I am now more clearer and confirm /agree with your view point as I have explored

Kavouss

2014-10-03 16:40 GMT+02:00 Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net>:

Oops! The second part of this message was intended to go to Kavouss only. I did not intend to make a point of it.

D

---
Sent from a handheld device.

> On 03.10.2014, at 16:27, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> Kavouss, colleagues,
>
> We have agreed and published a time line. We would be ill advised to formally discuss revising it before we even have formally heared significant and concrete reasons to revise it and had time to consider them. I have not yet heared any. Therefore I do not support any formal discussion about changing the time line at this point and I caution against a formal discussion of this topic during our upcoming LA meeting.
>
> Daniel
>
> Note well that personally I have spoken against this time line before we agreed it. Consult the minutes of our first f2f meeting for my reasons.
>
> Daniel
> ---
> Sent from a handheld device.