Hi Kavouss,

The charter has been publicly available for three weeks, it is not a long document, and there has already been community interest in it. What we are providing here is a mechanism for people who have looked at the charter to send us their comments, some of which they have already formulated. So even with one more week, people will have had four weeks to take the charter in and formulate their thoughts about it.

The charter is in some sense gating on other work we have before us, which is why I think everyone wants to get it done.

Also, we’re asking for major objections. I think receiving few comments should be viewed as success, not failure.

Alissa  

On 8/8/14, 11:35 AM, "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear All,
Yes ,we can move, but one week deadline for comments is really too short.
Why we are in hurry.
By the way,it is August and some people still on leave,knowing that I did not take any leave besing fully occupied with extensive exchange of e-mails with other ICG .
Please kindly take intoaccount the French proverb" VITE FAIT, MAL FAIT"
I suggest minimum 15 days for deadline
Pls kindly be pateint, prudent,comprehensive.
Even within 15 DAYS YOU MAY RECEIVE FEW COMMENTS ,all from ourown.s
Regards
KAVOUSS  


2014-08-08 20:28 GMT+02:00 Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>:
Okay, let’s move ahead with this. I had a side conversation with Milton
and I think we’re all roughly okay with moving forward.

If we get this posted today, we can make the deadline next Friday (one
week), and we can give Jari the weekend to come up with a possibly revised
charter for discussion on our August 19 call. I know this is not ideal —
short window, Friday deadline — but I think we better move forward.

Alice, please get this text posted to its own web page and send us the
link:

===

ICG Charter Open for Public Comments

On July 18, the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG)
produced a draft charter <link> that defines its own tasks. The ICG views
defining the broad outlines of its charter as important, but it views
finalizing the charter and moving on to the real work of the transition
planning to be of equal importance. Thus the ICG is opening up a short
public comment period on the charter to determine if there are any major
objections to the current draft that the ICG has not already taken into
account.

The charter is open for public comment until August 15, 2014 at 23:59 UTC.
Public comments are considered to be for the public record, and for the
information and consideration of all participants in this process, not
just for the ICG. Everyone is encouraged to review any public comments
that may be submitted via the process below.

Public comment submission process links:

Comment submission: <link>
List of comments submitted via this site: <link>
Charter: <link>
Deadline: August 15, 2014 at 23:59 UTC

===



On 8/8/14, 12:40 AM, "Daniel Karrenberg" <daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net>
wrote:

>I am in favor of moving ahead as Alissa suggests. The text is fine.
>
>I am also in favor of having a permanent comment mechanism, but that is
>secondary to moving ahead with receiving comments about the charter.
>
>We need to get the charter squared away.
>
>Daniel
>_______________________________________________
>Internal-cg mailing list
>Internal-cg@icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg


_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg