I support the language
circulated by Milton. I’m also supportive of Paul’s suggestion that we not limit
it to accountability alone. I made two suggested edits in blue
below:
From:
internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On
Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 8:57
AM
To: internal-cg@icann.org
Subject: [Internal-cg] scope
language
The IANA stewardship transition
process is taking place alongside a parallel
and related process on enhancing ICANN
accountability. While maintaining the accountability of Internet identifier
governance is central to both processes, this group’s scope is limited to
filling the accountability gaps created by the end of the NTIA’s role as
principal in the IANA contract, whereas the other process focuses on enhancing
the accountability of ICANN’s policy development process. Nevertheless, the two
processes are interrelated and
interdependent and the ICG must assess proposed
solutions in the light of the of the other accountability process.