Hello Seun and colleagues on the IANAXFER list,
Thank you
once again Seun for your question about the next steps.
I think this is a
useful question for others in the community as well.
As you are aware,
our proposal to the ICG describes high level
principles about the Review
Committee and the SLA including "IANA
Service Level Agreement Principles"
in the proposal, so RIRs will
consider implementation based on this
guidance.
Our role as the CRISP team is to provide guidance to the RIRs
in
the implementation of the proposal, and the details and process
of
implementation of the proposal is the responsibility of the RIRs.
The
charter of the review committee and actual contract text are part
of
implementation of the proposal which is the responsibility of the
RIRs.
Having said this, the CRISP Team believes it is important for
the
community to have clear visibility that RIRs acknowledges this
proposal
which references actions by them.
Therefore, after Step2 of
the ICG's latest timeline, when the proposals
by all three operational
communities are consolidated by the ICG, the
CRISP Team plans to formally
inform the executives of the RIRs about the
proposal submitted to the ICG
which references actions by the RIRs.
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/icg-process-timeline-07jan15-en.pdfWe
expect that there will be formal acknowledgement from the five RIRs
about
this, so it is clear to the community that the RIRs will take
the
appropriate steps to implement the proposal from the Number
Resources
community. We trust each RIR will consult with their
respective
communities as needed in preparing the SLA, and the Review
Committee is
to be established in an open and bottom-up manner, as we have
described
in the proposal.
I hope this clarifies the role of the
CRISP team and RIRs in future steps.
Regards,
Izumi
Okutani
The CRISP Team
On 2015/01/22 23:45, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
Great thanks for the first level clarification
Izumi.
Cheers!
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Izumi Okutani
<izumi@nic.ad.jp> wrote:
Hello Seun,
Just from what I can answer
for now,
- SLA
requirements
"IANA Service Level
Agreement Principles" are described in Section
III.A.3 of our proposal,
as you are probably aware. This lists
principles and elements to be
included in the SLA.
Both of the processes listed below will be
lead by the RIRs and not the
CRISP Team. I trust the RIRs will start
the process, so that we have
these them ready before the
transition.
- Charter of review committee
- Contract
actual text
I need to double check if
there is anything more we can say at this
stage as the CRISP Team -
Thanks for your question and
patience!
Regards,
Izumi
On 2015/01/22 13:29, Seun
Ojedeji wrote:
Hello Izumi,
You may have missed this
mail, could you/or any crisp team kindly provide
update?
Just
to clarify (in line of recent development), not all the 3 items
are
expected to be developed by this WG but will be good to know when
those
processes will start.
Thanks
sent from Google
nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 21 Jan 2015 09:37,
"Seun Ojedeji" <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello Izumi, CRISP team
Thanks again to
you and the entire team. I just want to ask about
what
the
next line of action will be? i.e are we to
wait until the ICG release
their
final proposal? or while we wait on ICG, we
also start the drafting
process
for the following:
- Charter of review
committee
- SLA requirements
- Contract actual
text
Thanks as i look forward to your
response
Regards
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Seun
Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:
http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng>
Mobile:
+2348035233535**alt
email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng
<seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng>*
The
key to understanding is humility - my view
!
_______________________________________________
ianaxfer
mailing list
ianaxfer@nro.nethttps://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer