Per our discussion on the call earlier this week, it would be good to get a few people on the hook to review the numbers proposal and share their Step I evaluations before the Feb 6 meeting (say, by Feb 4?). Out of the volunteers I’ve seen, I would suggest:

Others that have expressed interest are of course welcome to evaluate the proposal, now or later, and the above group can decide whether it wants to work together on a single evaluation or separately. Does that work for everyone, and particularly for the folks listed?

On Jan 15, 2015, at 9:38 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:

We have received the numbers proposal.

Begin forwarded message:

From: Izumi Okutani <izumi@nic.ad.jp>

Subject: [NRO-IANAXFER] Response to the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA from the Internet Number Community

Date: January 15, 2015 at 3:26:26 PM PST

To: icg-proposal@icann.org

Cc: "ianaxfer@nro.net" <ianaxfer@nro.net>

Dear Alissa Cooper and the ICG members,

On behalf of the Consolidated RIR IANA Stewardship Proposal Team (CRISP
Team), I respectfully submit the attached response to the IANA
Stewardship Transition Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the
IANA from the Internet Number Community.

Best Regards,
Izumi Okutani
Chair, CRISP Team

<CRISP ICG Cover Letter 15012015.pdf>

<ICG RFP Number Resource Proposal.pdf>

_______________________________________________
ianaxfer mailing list
ianaxfer@nro.net
https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer

_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg