This is exactly my understanding and "Handling community comments submitted to the ICG Forum Discussion Draft based on Singapore Meeting 11 February 2015 - V.1" implements that. If clarification is needed, can we hear proposed text? Daniel On 25.02.15 5:38 , joseph alhadeff wrote:

Kavouss:

By way of clarification, I think you are highlighting a confusion in the drafting which we need to clarify.

If ICG poses a question to a community related to a proposal, whether originated by us or one that we receive which we believe needs to be addressed , it must be answered - there is no latitude in that.

The more voluntary language was meant only to address an individual question which has come to us form an individual or group outside of the ICG which we don't require an answer to. While we suggest that the community endeavor to address those, as appropriate, we do not require that those questions be answered in an individualized manner.

Clearly the current draft, is resulting in confusion and needs to be clarified.

Joe

_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg