Thanks Narelle .. Good point that needs to be considered !! Optimally, sharing agreed stable versions would have been best; but I just thought that for practical reasons, given the tight timeframes and that we should be representing our communities views in the group, that parallel consultation may be necessary .. Kind Regards --Manal -----Original Message----- From: Narelle Clark [mailto:narelle.clark@accan.org.au] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 10:51 AM To: Manal Ismail; Joseph Alhadeff; daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net; internal-cg@icann.org Subject: RE: [Internal-cg] Information sharing beyond ICG .. Manal Many of us will be consulting widely on topics also discussed here, therefore I also have an expectation that items will be shared more broadly. It also goes hand in hand with the implicit expectation that people will be correspondingly respectful of the context of the discussion and not attribute parts inappropriately. It's easy to misattribute, also in an email chain. Especially when top posting and threading in email is mixed as it is these days! Best regards Narelle -----Original Message----- From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Manal Ismail Sent: Monday, 21 July 2014 6:46 PM To: Joseph Alhadeff; daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net; internal-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Information sharing beyond ICG .. Apologies for the misunderstanding .. Definitely this was not my intention nor I think was the intention of the reply .. I may have not chosen the right words .. I did not mean 'approval' per se .. I should have rather said 'explicit discussion' .. I was just trying not to depend on assumptions or guesses .. Kind Regards --Manal -----Original Message----- From: Joseph Alhadeff [mailto:joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 10:35 AM To: daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net; internal-cg@icann.org; Manal Ismail Subject: RE: [Internal-cg] Information sharing beyond ICG .. Colleagues: I don't have any issue with the solution proposed, but I do want to highlight that no single individual on this list can provide an explicit approval which is the purview of the group... Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) -----Original Message----- From: Manal Ismail [manal@tra.gov.eg] Received: Monday, 21 Jul 2014, 9:15AM To: Daniel Karrenberg [daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net]; internal-cg@icann.org [internal-cg@icann.org] Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Information sharing beyond ICG .. Many thanks Daniel .. This matches my understanding .. I just thought to seek explicit approval in case I have missed anything as a late comer .. Kind regards --Manal -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Karrenberg [mailto:daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 9:09 AM To: Manal Ismail; internal-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Information sharing beyond ICG .. On 21.07.14 9:03 , Manal Ismail wrote:

Is it ok to share, beyond this group, documents under discussion here or have you agreed to wait for versions approved by this coordination group first ?

This is a general question for all documents being exchanged, just to make sure I'm not violating any agreed rules by sharing working documents ..

Appreciate your advice ..

Manal, the group decided to have the e-mail archives of this list open to the public. So anything discussed on the list is for all practical purposes public. So personally I would feel totally comfortable with anyone sharing anything that happens on this list, including documents exchanged here. Daniel _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg