Summary of internally resolved questions re the protocol parameters and numbers proposals
Hi All, Attached is a chart produced under the action item: Secretariat to summarize questions/answers resolved internally about the Protocol parameters proposal and Numbers proposal discussed. It is also available on Dropbox in the FAQ subfolder here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/oqdu87v60ztrowe/Summary%20of%20internally%20resolv ed%20questions-v0.xlsx?dl=0 Please let me know if you have any questions. Best Regards, Jennifer ICG Secretariat
Hi, Thanks for this, it is very helpful. I think we should try to get the questions grouped, so that we can see what [similar] questions are asked to both OC. At least they should be grouped and numbered the same. In this example, "Content question" for IETF is 2.* while it is 1.* for numbers. I also see "IETF" misspelled in a number of places :-) Patrik
Hi Patrik, Typos and formatting have been fixed. Please see attached v1 of the chart. This is also available at the Dropbox link below: https://www.dropbox.com/s/iph9jd3y9pltugk/Summary%20of%20internally%20resolv ed%20questions-v1.xlsx?dl=0 Best Regards, Jennifer -----Original Message----- From: Patrik Fältström [mailto:paf@frobbit.se] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 1:04 AM To: Jennifer Chung Cc: ICG Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Summary of internally resolved questions re the protocol parameters and numbers proposals Hi, Thanks for this, it is very helpful. I think we should try to get the questions grouped, so that we can see what [similar] questions are asked to both OC. At least they should be grouped and numbered the same. In this example, "Content question" for IETF is 2.* while it is 1.* for numbers. I also see "IETF" misspelled in a number of places :-) Patrik
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Jennifer Chung wrote:
Typos and formatting have been fixed. Please see attached v1 of the chart.
This is also available at the Dropbox link below:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/iph9jd3y9pltugk/Summary%20of%20internally%20resolv ed%20questions-v1.xlsx?dl=0
Thank you for this. In cell 6D (answer to Protocol parameters question 1.3), there is a reference to the ICANN board. I think that that should be the ISOC board. In cell 16D (answer to Protocol parameters question 2.5), there is a reference to "the IAO". I think that should be the IAOC. In cell 25D (answer to Numbers question 2.5), it says "The new contract will be between the proposed Review Committee and ICANN." That is not accurate. The proposed contract would be between the RIRs and ICANN, as is correctly shown in cell 21D (answer to question 2.1). --apb (Alan Barrett)
Hi Alan, Attached please find v2 of the chart with the three items below corrected. This is also available at the Dropbox link below: https://www.dropbox.com/s/wad3entgv3dqr3m/Summary%20of%20internally%20resolv ed%20questions-v2.xlsx?dl=0 I have removed the previous incorrect v1 of the chart from the Dropbox. Best Regards, Jennifer -----Original Message----- From: Alan Barrett [mailto:apb@cequrux.com] Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:35 AM To: Jennifer Chung Cc: 'Patrik Fältström'; 'ICG' Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Summary of internally resolved questions re the protocol parameters and numbers proposals On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Jennifer Chung wrote:
Typos and formatting have been fixed. Please see attached v1 of the chart.
This is also available at the Dropbox link below:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/iph9jd3y9pltugk/Summary%20of%20internally%20r esolv ed%20questions-v1.xlsx?dl=0
Thank you for this. In cell 6D (answer to Protocol parameters question 1.3), there is a reference to the ICANN board. I think that that should be the ISOC board. In cell 16D (answer to Protocol parameters question 2.5), there is a reference to "the IAO". I think that should be the IAOC. In cell 25D (answer to Numbers question 2.5), it says "The new contract will be between the proposed Review Committee and ICANN." That is not accurate. The proposed contract would be between the RIRs and ICANN, as is correctly shown in cell 21D (answer to question 2.1). --apb (Alan Barrett)
participants (3)
-
Alan Barrett -
Jennifer Chung -
Patrik Fältström