On this agenda item: 14:15 - 15:00 CG meeting/conference call schedule. For those of us with demanding jobs other than ICANN, it would be useful if we could combine CG meetings with other ICANN meetings to some extent. E.g., target L.A. ICANN meeting in October for our next F2F, add a day on to the beginning or end. IETF or RIR meetings might serve a similar function if we think we need to increase the frequency of F2F meetings (which I hope we don't!) Just a thought. MM
For those of us with demanding jobs other than ICANN, it would be useful if we could combine CG meetings with other ICANN meetings to some extent. E.g., target L.A. ICANN meeting in October for our next F2F, add a day on to the beginning or end. IETF or RIR meetings might serve a similar function if we think we need to increase the frequency of F2F meetings (which I hope we don't!)
I agree with this as well. And IGF, which is coming up. Jari P.S. The IETF would be happy to see you all in some of our meetings, and you might even stay a few extra days, as we discuss IANA and other topics. You’d be warmly welcome in our Honolulu meeting (Nov 9-14) for instance :-) Or our upcoming Toronto meeting that starts a day after the coordination group meeting in London ends. Future meetings are at http://www.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.html We also have an IETF policy guest program run by ISOC, a very popular program and something that you might consider if you have not been to an IETF meeting earlier.
I also agree. BTW do we have an appropriate acronym for our group? "CG" seems too general. Maybe something with relation to IANA: ICG, CIG, CGI... Let's fix this asap to communicate to our respective groups. Wolf-Ulrich Sent from my personal phone
Am 13.07.2014 um 04:20 schrieb Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>:
For those of us with demanding jobs other than ICANN, it would be useful if we could combine CG meetings with other ICANN meetings to some extent. E.g., target L.A. ICANN meeting in October for our next F2F, add a day on to the beginning or end. IETF or RIR meetings might serve a similar function if we think we need to increase the frequency of F2F meetings (which I hope we don't!)
I agree with this as well. And IGF, which is coming up.
Jari
P.S. The IETF would be happy to see you all in some of our meetings, and you might even stay a few extra days, as we discuss IANA and other topics. You’d be warmly welcome in our Honolulu meeting (Nov 9-14) for instance :-) Or our upcoming Toronto meeting that starts a day after the coordination group meeting in London ends. Future meetings are at http://www.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.html We also have an IETF policy guest program run by ISOC, a very popular program and something that you might consider if you have not been to an IETF meeting earlier. _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
IANACG =================================================== On 13/07/14 08:03, Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de wrote:
I also agree.
BTW do we have an appropriate acronym for our group? "CG" seems too general. Maybe something with relation to IANA: ICG, CIG, CGI... Let's fix this asap to communicate to our respective groups.
Wolf-Ulrich
Sent from my personal phone
Am 13.07.2014 um 04:20 schrieb Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>:
For those of us with demanding jobs other than ICANN, it would be useful if we could combine CG meetings with other ICANN meetings to some extent. E.g., target L.A. ICANN meeting in October for our next F2F, add a day on to the beginning or end. IETF or RIR meetings might serve a similar function if we think we need to increase the frequency of F2F meetings (which I hope we don't!) I agree with this as well. And IGF, which is coming up.
Jari
P.S. The IETF would be happy to see you all in some of our meetings, and you might even stay a few extra days, as we discuss IANA and other topics. You’d be warmly welcome in our Honolulu meeting (Nov 9-14) for instance :-) Or our upcoming Toronto meeting that starts a day after the coordination group meeting in London ends. Future meetings are at http://www.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.html We also have an IETF policy guest program run by ISOC, a very popular program and something that you might consider if you have not been to an IETF meeting earlier. _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
The ICOBS - IANA CONSESUS BUILDERS sorry, i have read too many contracts, internet governance papers and government statements in the past 48 hours; this had a very bad effect on my sunday afternoon humour. but seriously: it says what we are, or at least what we should try very hard to be. as to physical meetings: as few as possible please! one to kick off and one to finalise a draft proposal should be sufficient. let us use the internet to do the coordination part. let us save time and energy to talk to the communities rather than waste time, energy and money to travel, meet and spend time among ourselves. Daniel ---------- Sent from a hand held device.
On 13.07.2014, at 13:20, Hartmut Richard Glaser <glaser@cgi.br> wrote:
IANACG
===================================================
On 13/07/14 08:03, Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de wrote: I also agree.
BTW do we have an appropriate acronym for our group? "CG" seems too general. Maybe something with relation to IANA: ICG, CIG, CGI... Let's fix this asap to communicate to our respective groups.
Wolf-Ulrich
Sent from my personal phone
Am 13.07.2014 um 04:20 schrieb Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>:
For those of us with demanding jobs other than ICANN, it would be useful if we could combine CG meetings with other ICANN meetings to some extent. E.g., target L.A. ICANN meeting in October for our next F2F, add a day on to the beginning or end. IETF or RIR meetings might serve a similar function if we think we need to increase the frequency of F2F meetings (which I hope we don't!) I agree with this as well. And IGF, which is coming up.
Jari
P.S. The IETF would be happy to see you all in some of our meetings, and you might even stay a few extra days, as we discuss IANA and other topics. You’d be warmly welcome in our Honolulu meeting (Nov 9-14) for instance :-) Or our upcoming Toronto meeting that starts a day after the coordination group meeting in London ends. Future meetings are at http://www.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.html We also have an IETF policy guest program run by ISOC, a very popular program and something that you might consider if you have not been to an IETF meeting earlier. _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
Or maybe something related to the multi-stakeholder nature of the coordination group - MultiStakeholder Coordination Group (MCG)? -- Elise From: "Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de" <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de> Date: Sunday, July 13, 2014 at 4:03 AM To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Cc: "internal-cg@icann.org" <internal-cg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] scheduling meetings
I also agree.
BTW do we have an appropriate acronym for our group? "CG" seems too general. Maybe something with relation to IANA: ICG, CIG, CGI... Let's fix this asap to communicate to our respective groups.
Wolf-Ulrich
Sent from my personal phone
Am 13.07.2014 um 04:20 schrieb Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>:
For those of us with demanding jobs other than ICANN, it would be useful if we could combine CG meetings with other ICANN meetings to some extent. E.g., target L.A. ICANN meeting in October for our next F2F, add a day on to the beginning or end. IETF or RIR meetings might serve a similar function if we think we need to increase the frequency of F2F meetings (which I hope we don't!)
I agree with this as well. And IGF, which is coming up.
Jari
P.S. The IETF would be happy to see you all in some of our meetings, and you might even stay a few extra days, as we discuss IANA and other topics. You¹d be warmly welcome in our Honolulu meeting (Nov 9-14) for instance :-) Or our upcoming Toronto meeting that starts a day after the coordination group meeting in London ends. Future meetings are at http://www.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.html We also have an IETF policy guest program run by ISOC, a very popular program and something that you might consider if you have not been to an IETF meeting earlier. _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
MuSHCoG? No. Or maybe something related to the multi-stakeholder nature of the coordination group - Multi-Stakeholder Coordination Group (MCG)? -- Elise From: "Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de<mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de>" <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de<mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de>> Date: Sunday, July 13, 2014 at 4:03 AM To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net<mailto:jari.arkko@piuha.net>> Cc: "internal-cg@icann.org<mailto:internal-cg@icann.org>" <internal-cg@icann.org<mailto:internal-cg@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] scheduling meetings I also agree. BTW do we have an appropriate acronym for our group? "CG" seems too general. Maybe something with relation to IANA: ICG, CIG, CGI... Let's fix this asap to communicate to our respective groups. Wolf-Ulrich Sent from my personal phone Am 13.07.2014 um 04:20 schrieb Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net<mailto:jari.arkko@piuha.net>>: For those of us with demanding jobs other than ICANN, it would be useful if we could combine CG meetings with other ICANN meetings to some extent. E.g., target L.A. ICANN meeting in October for our next F2F, add a day on to the beginning or end. IETF or RIR meetings might serve a similar function if we think we need to increase the frequency of F2F meetings (which I hope we don't!) I agree with this as well. And IGF, which is coming up. Jari P.S. The IETF would be happy to see you all in some of our meetings, and you might even stay a few extra days, as we discuss IANA and other topics. You'd be warmly welcome in our Honolulu meeting (Nov 9-14) for instance :-) Or our upcoming Toronto meeting that starts a day after the coordination group meeting in London ends. Future meetings are at http://www.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.html We also have an IETF policy guest program run by ISOC, a very popular program and something that you might consider if you have not been to an IETF meeting earlier. _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org<mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org<mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
fully agree to this. ---------- Sent from an iPad
On Jul 12, 2014, at 19:32, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> wrote:
On this agenda item: 14:15 - 15:00 CG meeting/conference call schedule.
For those of us with demanding jobs other than ICANN, it would be useful if we could combine CG meetings with other ICANN meetings to some extent. E.g., target L.A. ICANN meeting in October for our next F2F, add a day on to the beginning or end. IETF or RIR meetings might serve a similar function if we think we need to increase the frequency of F2F meetings (which I hope we don't!)
Just a thought.
MM _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
And for those of us in far flung corners of the planet, it makes much more sense to have these meetings back to back with other events, to reduce the quantum of travel, and to maximise benefits when we do travel... Cheers Keith On 14/07/2014 10:56 a.m., Adiel Akplogan wrote:
fully agree to this.
---------- Sent from an iPad
On Jul 12, 2014, at 19:32, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> wrote:
On this agenda item: 14:15 - 15:00 CG meeting/conference call schedule.
For those of us with demanding jobs other than ICANN, it would be useful if we could combine CG meetings with other ICANN meetings to some extent. E.g., target L.A. ICANN meeting in October for our next F2F, add a day on to the beginning or end. IETF or RIR meetings might serve a similar function if we think we need to increase the frequency of F2F meetings (which I hope we don't!)
Just a thought.
MM _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
participants (8)
-
Adiel Akplogan -
Daniel Karrenberg -
Elise Gerich -
Hartmut Richard Glaser -
Jari Arkko -
Keith Davidson -
Milton L Mueller -
Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben＠t-online.de