Is the archive available to everyone? Don't we think that is a good idea for transparency reasons? If people have comments, to what entry point do they send comments? We can not risk having people say this is not transparent. I want to ensure we are. Patrik - on vacation...but thinking
I'm in agreement that this list should be publicly archived. Also - some parts thus far are useful for putting the concepts back to our respective communities for consultation and feedback. I have already used the agenda, and some thoughts on the process and framing questions to gain feedback from the broader ISOC community already, and I would encourage all to do similarly. Narelle -----Original Message----- From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Patrik Fältström Sent: Thursday, 17 July 2014 6:00 AM Is the archive available to everyone? Don't we think that is a good idea for transparency reasons? If people have comments, to what entry point do they send comments? We can not risk having people say this is not transparent. I want to ensure we are. Patrik - on vacation...but thinking
Do we wish to have formal inflection points for comments related to any drafts that occur? On 7/16/2014 3:59 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
Is the archive available to everyone? Don't we think that is a good idea for transparency reasons? If people have comments, to what entry point do they send comments?
We can not risk having people say this is not transparent. I want to ensure we are.
Patrik - on vacation...but thinking
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
participants (3)
-
joseph alhadeff -
Narelle Clark -
Patrik Fältström